Kane Evans @ The judiciary. Does he miss the elimination final?

[strider]

f**king ridiculous .... evans is a tall merkin ... he never raised his arm or anything. It was a shirt front. ... Burgess got downgraded for the same charge when he swang at and hit moylan

The NRL are deadset clueless

 

[hineyrulz]

Well i’d like to say I’m surprised, they are just getting a penalty Bronco’s in early.

 

[Happy MEel]

Looks like we did get the Lionel Hutz of QC’s. 0/2 last night.

In all seriousness though the judiciary and MRC are an absolute farce. They’ve done nothing but open themselves up for more ridicule by downgrading almost identical tackles and upholding Evans’.

 

[hindy111]

Looks like we did get the Lionel huts of QC’s. 0/2 last night.

In all seriousness though the judiciary and MRC are an absolute farce. They’ve done nothing but open themselves up for more ridicule by downgrading almost identical tackles and upholding Evans’.

Sivo has made atleast 3 tackles the same as Evans

 

[Gronk]

I might just leave this here...

Burgess was also charged with grade 2 careless and won a downgrade to a fine

 

[Gary Gutful]

Plop.

 

[Tooooks]

Thought is not evidence.

Correct. It is their job to decide how credible his evidence was.

 

[Noise]

5 of the 8 teams have a forward suspended for week 1 of the finals with JWH getting lucky.

Souths - Surgess
Raiders - Eye gouger
Parra - Evans
Manly - Tapau
Broncos - TPJ

That’s a fair amount of talent missing.

 

[Twizzle]

no doubt determined by the injury to Parker

 

[eel01s]

So the judiciary have agreed that Evans can no longer tackle front on.

What gets me is when there is a head clash between attacker and front on defender. There is never a penalty, sin bin or suspension. Yes it is an accident, but so was Kane's tackle.

 

[oldmancraigy]

So the judiciary have agreed that Evans can no longer tackle front on.

What gets me is when there is a head clash between attacker and front on defender. There is never a penalty, sin bin or suspension. Yes it is an accident, but so was Kane's tackle.

You can argue that some accidents shouldn't happen, and more care should be taken, but in this case it wasn't even careless! Parker slipped and fell into his shoulder.

 

[T.S Quint]

Wasn’t the first contact with Parker’s shoulder?
No swinging arm. No shoulder charge.
I’m absolutely baffled as to why this was graded so highly.

And yet somehow Billy Slater was able to argue that a shoulder charge wasn’t a shoulder charge.

 

[Twizzle]

Wasn’t the first contact with Parker’s shoulder?
No swinging arm. No shoulder charge.
I’m absolutely baffled as to why this was graded so highly.

And yet somehow Billy Slater was able to argue that a shoulder charge wasn’t a shoulder charge.

no doubt determined by the injury to Parker

 

[Tooooks]

The bloke is 6’6’’ ffs. No swinging arm etc. It’s a joke of a decision.

Hopefully we get to week two.

 

[Stevie]

I’m pretty upset hearing this result. It’s a massive loss losing Evans up front.

 

[Eelogical]

I’m pretty upset hearing this result. It’s a massive loss losing Evans up front.

Imagine if you'd made this post a year ago.

 

[Oscarman]

So it's the National Roosters (and Storm) League yet again.

 

[Tooooks]

Imagine if you'd made this post a year ago.

Haha I was thinking last night, who would’ve thought a few months ago that anyone would care if he was suspended for a game. He’s surprised a lot of people.

 

[Glenn]

So it's the National Roosters (and Storm) League yet again.

As always

 

[Glenn]

Haha I was thinking last night, who would’ve thought a few months ago that anyone would care if he was suspended for a game. He’s surprised a lot of people.

The work with Spudd is paying dividends.