Soren Lorenson
First Grade
- Messages
- 7,924
Pretty sure Luke played RMC last week with the Planewhere did he go? And Meni luke?
Pretty sure Luke played RMC last week with the Planewhere did he go? And Meni luke?
Finally after all these years.. he got oneJ Lusick with a dive over.
who’d of thought
Finally after all these years.. he got one
Boooooooooooooooods!!!!
Even worse than Dane Gagai in 2016!
Wow, he really adds some value...
Is there a venn diagram for what you're proposing... and if so is there any merkin who is actually saying both things at the same time? Or is it just something your conflicting troll mind conjures up for you to argue (or "educate" lol) against?It's the merkins who think Matt Arthur is responsible for his team's results, but also blame the coach for the team's results, who think "a lot of different conflicting things..."
What do you actually gain from posting such meaningless generalised statements... which you then flip-flop and contradict to serve another imaginary argument (or "education" lol) a few days or weeks later? (Other than the troll's dopamine hit....)I've made pretty clear I think it's a team game. I don't blame the team's youngest players any more than I blame the coach. I'd say the coach has more influence than a junior player, but he absolutely doesn't have total control of anything.
Didn’t you make up that stupid “win percentage before age of 21” or whatever it was metric as a measure of how good a young player is? Make up your f**king mind, you stupid contrary merkin.It's the merkins who think Matt Arthur is responsible for his team's results, but also blame the coach for the team's results, who think "a lot of different conflicting things..."
I've made pretty clear I think it's a team game. I don't blame the team's youngest players any more than I blame the coach. I'd say the coach has more influence than a junior player, but he absolutely doesn't have total control of anything.
I made up that statistic to take the piss you dopey clown. But if it does have any actual relevance, it's for older players, to describe the quality of a player's career. A guy who played 200 NRL games but lost most of them probably bounced around some shitty clubs (or stayed at one for a decade) where there wasn't much competition. It's not the same as some merkin who played 200 games in strong rosters where he played in a high proportion of wins.Didn’t you make up that stupid “win percentage before age of 21” or whatever it was metric as a measure of how good a young player is? Make up your f**king mind, you stupid contrary merkin.
You are such an obnoxious, stupid f**king merkin. An utter blight on this forum. And incredibly arrogant for someone who is a really deeply ignorant and stupid person.I made up that statistic to take the piss you dopey clown. But if it does have any actual relevance, it's for older players, to describe the quality of a player's career. A guy who played 200 NRL games but lost most of them probably bounced around some shitty clubs (or stayed at one for a decade) where there wasn't much competition. It's not the same as some merkin who played 200 games in strong rosters where he played in a high proportion of wins.
Regarding young players, WPYSA18 is into the territory of small samples. This is why it's inherently speculative to judge youngsters, whether positively or negatively.
It's the merkins who think Matt Arthur is responsible for his team's results, but also blame the coach for the team's results, who think "a lot of different conflicting things..."
I've made pretty clear I think it's a team game. I don't blame the team's youngest players any more than I blame the coach. I'd say the coach has more influence than a junior player, but he absolutely doesn't have total control of anything.