The Predictor
Bench
- Messages
- 2,599
Yet Ryles tows the line to the teams detriment, I know who’d I’d rather when it comes to having a whingeFlanno is a whiny bitch. Whinges about everything. I doubt he's taken seriously.
Yet Ryles tows the line to the teams detriment, I know who’d I’d rather when it comes to having a whingeFlanno is a whiny bitch. Whinges about everything. I doubt he's taken seriously.
Ryles is a part of that recruitment team. And all Ryles has shown us is that he is capable of competing for a spoon.
Disagree that we are inconsistent. We are consistently shit.I've seen better structures in place.
We're a young team, with loads of inexperience. Inconsistency is part of having a young team.
No to mention key players being unavailable for so long.
Ryles may well tell the recruitment team who to target, but it's not his responsibility to get the details of the contracts sorted, which is an area that may pose a problem.
You cant whinge about refereeing decisions in a game you miss 50 tackles and complete at under 60%Yet Ryles tows the line to the teams detriment, I know who’d I’d rather when it comes to having a whinge
Problem is, we haven’t signed anyone of note really since the 7 left basically in 2021, getting to the GF while pleasing has really harmed the club with poor extensions, retentions, options and continual signing of reserve graders hoping to get lightning in a bottle.
Have to hope that the front office suddenly get on a roll, unlikely but it’s what we need to see .
Agree with most of what you said, but I'd argue that we had a forwards leader in both Nathan Brown, and Reagan Campbell-Gillard.
You cant whinge about refereeing decisions in a game you miss 50 tackles and complete at under 60%
the optics on that are you are passing the buck rather looking at what you can control.
If we’d lost the game by 6-10 points yesterday, I think Ryles would have made a comment about lopsided officiating, but when you lose by 20+ points with those stats, you won’t be taken seriously
You cant whinge about refereeing decisions in a game you miss 50 tackles and complete at under 60%
the optics on that are you are passing the buck rather looking at what you can control.
If we’d lost the game by 6-10 points yesterday, I think Ryles would have made a comment about lopsided officiating, but when you lose by 20+ points with those stats, you won’t be taken seriously
Fui?Let's play fill in the gaps.
Averillo could be 5/8 or centre
Tino (pipedream)
David Fifita
Between Kautoga, Williams, Tuialagi, Will Latu we can probably cover 2nd row. Not against signing a gun 2nd rower
From row we will have Jnr, Tuivaiti, Moretti. We need two front rowers
Centres if we dont get a speedster like Averillo then im not sure what the options are but sure as shit we need some pace in the 3/4 line.
I really hope there are signings on the way.
Raiders have a lot of good forwards. Go forward, no nonsense. Big and athletic.
We actually need a forward leader...we dont and haven't had one since Ray Price...
Yes but if you watch the Raiders, they look to see if there is anyone there to offload to and they made fewer mistakes.But you have to also complete and that's where we eff it up..59% completions is not even acceptable for a pub team
The Parra game was very different to the Dragons v Bulldogs. Refereeing didn't cost us the game. Flanno is a f**kwit. Glad he isn't our coach.Yet Ryles tows the line to the teams detriment, I know who’d I’d rather when it comes to having a whinge
We aren't consistently shit. We show pockets of quality football in a lot of games. In yesterday's game we were shit, good and then shit again.Disagree that we are inconsistent. We are consistently shit.
I agree, I wasn’t necessarily talking about this game, but past games, Ryles comes across quite passive, hence continuation of dubious calls, no matter how shit we are, until we stop being shit we will continue getting the rubbish callsYou cant whinge about refereeing decisions in a game you miss 50 tackles and complete at under 60%
the optics on that are you are passing the buck rather looking at what you can control.
If we’d lost the game by 6-10 points yesterday, I think Ryles would have made a comment about lopsided officiating, but when you lose by 20+ points with those stats, you won’t be taken seriously
Which teams are consistently shit? And consistently good? Because by your description every team would be inconsistent, even the top of the competition Raiders.We aren't consistently shit. We show pockets of quality football in a lot of games. In yesterday's game we were shit, good and then shit again.
Yep, but Klein needed to police both sides the same. That’s what often is the issue. 8-0 penalty count and 6 agains and Klein always seems to be influenced by one teams table position and the crowd.Need to fix our discipline.
The Raiders can be poor at times. They blew a good start against the eels yesterday.Which teams are consistently shit? And consistently good? Because by your description every team would be inconsistent, even the top of the competition Raiders.
I think if you up the top of the table you are consistently good. If you are fighting for the spoon you are consistently shit.
Dude, they are 1st with only 3 losses and they have played most of the top 8 teams already.The Raiders can be poor at times. They blew a good start against the eels yesterday.
I think there are degrees of consistency rather than it being a yes/no.