What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rumours and Stuff

Johnny88

Juniors
Messages
1,522

How the ghosts of Galvin prompted Parramatta’s Pezet deal​


Adrian Proszenko


When Lachlan Galvin turned down the chance to join Parramatta last season, the decision was all the more painful for the club because they should never have let him leave in the first place.
The Eels tried to buy back the farm after deciding Galvin, who always dreamed of wearing the blue and gold, wasn’t up to it while in their junior pathways system.

ā€œWe didn’t leave because of other kids,ā€ his father James once told me. ā€œIt was more the coaches thought Lachie wasn’t going to get there.ā€
It was a costly mistake, one the Eels don’t want to repeat. Which is why, in their quest to find a long-term halves partner for Mitchell Moses, they are entering into one of the most unique contractual calls in NRL history.

Their decision to offer in-demand Melbourne playmaker Jonah Pezet a one-year contract, at first glance, appears an exercise in short-termism. What is the point, many Parramatta fans have already vented online, of bringing in a half and developing combinations, only to let him walk out the door in 12 months’ time?
Ironically, coach Jason Ryles has made the call with the future at the forefront of his mind. Parramatta have some of the best junior halves in the game already in their system. The pick of the litter could well be Lincoln Fletcher and Lorenzo Talataina, but there’s also Talen Risati and Te Hurinui Twidle.
Jonah Pezet is on his way to Parramatta, but only for a short time.

Jonah Pezet is on his way to Parramatta, but only for a short time.Credit:Getty Images
Fletcher is a genuine organising halfback, an Australian Schoolboys star who is still eligible for SG Ball after playing in last year’s grand final of that competition. Talataina is five-eighth in the Dylan Brown mode, has a better kicking game, was the SG Ball player of the year and got a taste of NSW Cup late last season.
The Eels feel, if given time to develop, the answer to their long-term halves conundrum is already on their books.


Which is where Pezet comes in. Ryles has a strong relationship with Pezet from their time together in Melbourne and believes the 22-year-old will help bring through the crop of promising playmakers, who are probably a season away from the rigours of first-grade football.
If the Eels were to sign Pezet on a longer contract, they would run the risk of losing a talented junior who felt his path to the NRL was blocked.
Lachlan Galvin slipped through Parramatta’s fingers twice.

Lachlan Galvin slipped through Parramatta’s fingers twice.Credit:Getty Images
The move has the potential to benefit all parties. The Eels should be competitive next season with a spine that includes Moses, Pezet, Ken Thornett medalist Isaiah Iongi at fullback and a hooker rotation of Ryley Smith and Tallyn Da Silva.
It gives Pezet – whose father Troy played a season for Parramatta in 1998 – a chance to add to his 18 NRL appearances after being stuck behind Cameron Munster and Jahrome Hughes in Melbourne. And when his Eels deal expires, he will shift to Brisbane to replace Adam Reynolds as the long-term No.7.

The arrival of Pezet at Parramatta, pending a medical clearance next week when he comes back from a holiday, will have a knock-on effect. Dean Hawkins, who made a dozen first-grade appearances in the halves for the Eels next year, has been granted a release to pursue a long-term deal in the English Super League.
And Joash Papalii, who filled in capably in a number of positions last season without cementing any one of them, will be given more time to develop, most likely off the bench.
The Pezet move is in keeping with Ryles’ philosophy of setting Parramatta up for the future, rather than chasing quick wins that could leave the club exposed down the track. If he was after the latter, he would have hung onto Clint Gutherson, Regan Campbell-Gillard, Maika Sivo, Joe Ofahengaue and Bryce Cartwright.
Knowing when to blood a talented young half isn’t a problem unique to Parramatta, with clubs all across the NRL grappling with quandary. Sometimes a bridging player can be a bridge too far.
At Manly, they have in Onitoni Large and Joe Walsh – the latter made his NRL debut off the bench in the last game of the season – two or the most exciting juniors in the game. Had Daly Cherry-Evans stayed for one more season, it may have turned out to be the perfect time for one or both to come through. However, the departure of ā€œDCEā€ prompted the Sea Eagles to find a replacement, resulting in a three-year deal for Canberra’s Jamal Fogarty. Only time will tell if that is a year or two too long.

Then there’s the expected arrival of Cherry-Evans at the Roosters, which has already resulted in Sandon Smith being squeezed out to Newcastle. How long will Hugo Savala and NSW under-19s halfback Toby Rodwell be prepared to bide their time?
Is Canberra’s Ethan Sanders – a Parramatta junior who ironically left because he didn’t see a future at the Eels – ready for first grade next year?
And then, over at the Bulldogs, you have Galvin. Having offloaded Toby Sexton, is Galvin ready to run the team? Is exciting prospect Mitch Woods ready to start next season as the Canterbury halfback? Is it too much to ask of two youngsters?
The Eels have made their decision. Whether their young guns turn out to be as good as Galvin, only time will tell. However, they’ve learnt the hard way that the Lachlan Galvins of the world don’t come around often, so it’s best not to let them slip through your fingers.

 

lingard

Coach
Messages
11,572
One of my friend's made a great point yesterday. If Pezet was truly the next big thing at 7 why didn't the Storm hold onto him and allow Jarome Hughes to leave?

They'd know more about Pezet's value and ceiling better than all of us put together.
Not such a great point. Hughes has, at times over the past couple of years, been the best 7 in the NRL - and certainly in the top three. Why would they let him go for the 'next big thing' when they already have the 'current big thing'?
 

85 Baby

Juniors
Messages
1,279
It's moot (lol) because we won't be able to compare 2026-with-Pezet vs 2026-without-him. We might come close to a comparison if he plays exactly half a season, but as I've said, 12 games is too small a sample to draw any conclusions. For example, we could play better teams in the 12 games with him than without, or we could have more players either available or unavailable during his 12 games.
Goal setting rule number 2 - measurable. If the belief is Pezet will help us win more games then surely there’d be a measurement against that?
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
97,538
Goal setting rule number 2 - measurable. If the belief is Pezet will help us win more games then surely there’d be a measurement against that?
You mean like winning more than this year? It's pretty simplistic. How about just measuring Pezet's output against any alternatives we have in the roster? Again, we won't be able to compare them within the same year, unless they play an equal number of games (in which case the samples would be too small).

I get it though. I work in a bureaucracy too, where we have to pretend everything is measurable. Because science.
 

Eelctrifying

Juniors
Messages
366
Apparently, Anasta confirmed the deal on the radio, saying Parra offered a multi-year deal that was significantly more money than Brisbane offered. Jonah still decided to go to the Broncos due to their pitch.

So effectively, we got a player for a year who took less money to buy into another club because he didn't see Parra as his future. This club can be a joke sometimes.
 

Eelctrifying

Juniors
Messages
366

How the ghosts of Galvin prompted Parramatta’s Pezet deal​


Adrian Proszenko


When Lachlan Galvin turned down the chance to join Parramatta last season, the decision was all the more painful for the club beca

I mean, this article doesn't make sense if we offered Pezet a multi-year deal on decent coin, yeah? If it was always the plan to have him for a year, we wouldn't have done that (if what is going around is true).

Seems like this is just a cop out excuse.
 

viole02

Juniors
Messages
103
I just dont fully understand the ethos of what Ryles wants to do with pezet. Preface that I think Ryles did good this year. However this season we didnt start players who we didnt think had a future at the club but we're willing to sign a halfback whos solid at best currently? but also a bit of an unknown at 6 and hasnt had regular first grade footie.

However we think he can elevate us into the top8 but this kid isnt part of our future. You could argue we could do that with volkman/joash/lorenzo if moses stayed healthy (end of season run showed we can beat good teams). So although pezet is probably better than our current options but are we that much better with him? Instead we could be building a potential long term partnership with someon currently on the roster?

If we get pezet for the 300-400k mark - ok maybe its worth a punt otherwise what are we really doing...
 

hindy111

Post Whore
Messages
65,918
Not such a great point. Hughes has, at times over the past couple of years, been the best 7 in the NRL - and certainly in the top three. Why would they let him go for the 'next big thing' when they already have the 'current big thing'?

Hughes or Munster.....
If they really rate Pezet highly they would of loaned him out like Harry Grant style. And if he shined let one of Munster/Hughes go. It's isnt like they wouldnt have any buyers.
 

Latest posts

Top