Believe he wanted a further 2 year extension as he had a SuperLeague offer, club wanted to keep him but the term was an issue and allowed him to accept the longer deal . In a sense , Pezet has replaced Footy Dean for 2026.So Hawkins gone?
Was the Hawkins discussions before or after the Pezet ones?Believe he wanted a further 2 year extension as he had a SuperLeague offer, club wanted to keep him but the term was an issue and allowed him to accept the longer deal . In a sense , Pezet has replaced Footy Dean for 2026.
Jennifer? Yep. I put her away.So Hawkins gone?
Yeh and then supposedly hell need another full season of nrl before hes "ready" so well have wasted all those players prime anyways?He will be a year older with a whole extra preseason and a full year of reserve grade under his belt. He should be a much better player by then. Unfortunately Moses will be 33 and Paulo (34), Walker (33) and JAC (32) might all be gone. Why waste 2026? Missing the finals for a fourth straight year isn’t how you build for a premiership. Rebuilding is only supposed to take one year ffs
I love how people just think “we might as well go and grab xxxx” like you don’t need the planets to align to attract any talented halves.Might as well make a play at metcalf and get him to do the classic compassionate grounds to leave nzl early. That way we improve for thus year and build our future. Like if we were so convinced on lorenzo surely we woukdnt have offered pezet a long conrract initially
Not sure, but think Pezet was agreed and was an easier decision to move on from Footy Dean, almost at the same time really.Was the Hawkins discussions before or after the Pezet ones?
I love how people just think “we might as well go and grab xxxx” like you don’t need the planets to align to attract any talented halves.
f**k me.
PS Metcalf re-signed btw![]()
By the looks of it before. He didn't play in any grade after Iongi came back from injury moving Joash back to 6. He spent 4 weeks wildernessNot sure, but think Pezet was agreed and was an easier decision to move on from Footy Dean, almost at the same time really.
40/40?it's Parra, they are all less than 50/50
85/15. As long as they do their best I'll be happy40/40?
You are an inveterate liar as well as a troll.He literally had Moses and Drown in front of him. I suppose your ‘contacts’ at the club have information that they weren’t blocking him?
Braith says it wasn’t money and ‘Melbourne could have kept going’ with the money because they wanted him.
My mail is that we put an offer on the table for Pezet for 3 years and they looked at it seriously.
Brisbane came in with a better offer, but only starting 2027. We were asked would we consider a 1 year deal at a lesser price and given our hope for Lorenzo, et al, as future NRL players, we decided Pezet would be an improved short term solution over Footy Dean and Volkman.
Not sure that means we got played or that there is smoke being blown up anyone's ass with what is being said.
Ive heard from my little birds that Parra offered him 12 months but they were 12 individual months spread out over 4 years. Dean wanted all of the months to be concurrent and thats what broke the deal.Believe he wanted a further 2 year extension as he had a SuperLeague offer, club wanted to keep him but the term was an issue and allowed him to accept the longer deal . In a sense , Pezet has replaced Footy Dean for 2026.
Ive heard from my little birds that Parra offered him 12 months but they were 12 individual months spread out over 4 years. Dean wanted all of the months to be concurrent and thats what broke the deal.