The Axe of Druss
Bench
- Messages
- 3,315
Why would I you dope. Im referring to all rule interpretationsAnd I'm asking if there is another example of that particular ruling.
You don't have one, just admit it
Why would I you dope. Im referring to all rule interpretationsAnd I'm asking if there is another example of that particular ruling.
You don't have one, just admit it
Because that's what I was asking about when you decided to butt in.Why would I you dope. Im referring to all rule interpretations
The funniest part of this is Easts fans thinking they still support a big relevant club.

There were 3 blatant incidents of foul play just ignored by the bunker in 3 separate matches - on Keppie (high tackle across throat), Fermor (high tackle across face) and Walsh (hit late). Two of those incidents led directly to tries being scored the next set by their opponents.
The number of times the refs change interpretations in the same season just adds another layer of imbalance to the competition.
Yes indeed, was like the commentators were watching something else entirelyAnother I noticed - and at the risk of upsetting Valheru and the Roosters brigade - how about that magnificent tackle from Tedesco to deny Tuilaga a try yesterday afternoon. Marvellous covering tackle where even the commentators missed the very clear swinging arm to the head.
Its called conversation bud but hey, you keep jibbering to no one thenBecause that's what I was asking about when you decided to butt in.
Concession noted
Another I noticed - and at the risk of upsetting Valheru and the Roosters brigade - how about that magnificent tackle from Tedesco to deny Tuilaga a try yesterday afternoon. Marvellous covering tackle where even the commentators missed the very clear swinging arm to the head.

I wasn't aware that an incident and subsequent injury had such a bearing on whether a player is suspended, put on report, penalised or isnt even noticed. Thanks for the clarification.Yes, and Tulilaga suffered a significant injury from it and will miss upwards of 6 weeks... oh, wait![]()
I wasn't aware that an incident and subsequent injury had such a bearing on whether a player is suspended, put on report, penalised or isnt even noticed. Thanks for the clarification.
Ok. Onfield referee and bunker didn't even look at it, despite it being; high, moderate force, direct to the head and in the act of scoring a try. It's on the video highlights of the game on the NRL site and it's pretty clear that all of those criteria were involved. But not even a penalty, so its hard to be charged? At the start of the year that is probably a sinbin. Also at the start of the year the NRL were actively discouraging 'milking'. If Tuilagi stays down he probably draws attention to the incident. But rely who knows at this point.The NRL have said publicly a few seasons back that any resulting injury from foul play will affect the grading of any charge on a player who committed said act.
Ok. Onfield referee and bunker didn't even look at it, despite it being; high, moderate force, direct to the head and in the act of scoring a try. It's on the video highlights of the game on the NRL site and it's pretty clear that all of those criteria were involved. But not even a penalty, so its hard to be charged? At the start of the year that is probably a sinbin. Also at the start of the year the NRL were actively discouraging 'milking'. If Tuilagi stays down he probably draws attention to the incident. But rely who knows at this point.
Is there a way to bookmark this exchange for when Tedesco ducks into a high tackle?

Of what? Favoured clubs getting good calls over the non-favoured ones? Comon man, dont be naive
The funniest part of this is Easts fans thinking they still support a big relevant club.
Please never change. There is something weirdly comforting about how predictable you are…2 perplexing decisions from the bunker in the games tonight.
Have they changed the knock on rule without telling us?
The warriors challenge that they were successful with was a clear knock on, it hit the warriors player than the Roosters player immediately after and they somehow called it a knock back.
The Penrith one where they challenged and he clean dropped it in the tackle was equally as bizarre.
I get it, no one is going to feel sorry for either team and both were well beaten but if thats the standard, we are going to have some controversial results.
Maybe the old usual call of "Penalty Broncos " has seen its day ?I didn't see the first game tonight, and I was watching the Brisbane-Penrith game on my phone while at work, but even on that little screen, that Penrith 'no knock-on' decision deadset looked like Jenkins knocked-on.
Now, I hate the Broncs as much as anyone and will celebrate anything and everything that goes against them, but even I saw that one and was perplexed. And it's been a LONG time since I heard an entire stadium loudly and clearly get the "BULL..S**T! BULL..S**T!" chant going. I did enjoy that, and frankly, I didn't disagree with them.
Couldn't agree more.f**k, I am tired with people blaming the ref for their teams shitness.
