So the accusers of man-love for Mortimer, i.e. lingard, WOE and caylo can't accept it when they are accused of man-love for Humble by Springs, et al, and vice-versa?
This is a hilarious discussion :lol: "your wrong, no your wrong, shut up, no you shut up".
None of ya's can agree, stop acting like you know facts; i.e. " If Humble had been given as much of a go at first grade as Mortimer, we would be saying "Daniel who?"" How do you know that? It is biased claims like that which make both sides of the argument sound completely invalid.
First and for most, you have the biggest man crush on Mortz and as they say "those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones".
My comments weren't so much about humble as they are about Mortimer. If we had Barrett, Anasta, Mullens or Campese in our squad do you think I would want Humble in the number 6 jersey. ATM I think our two options at 5-8 are mortimer and humble and I am of the opinnion that Mortimer performances this season were at the standard of a Bundy Cup player and I think humble would be the better option.
People misinterprate chosing one player over another as man-love but it more or less who you think is better suited. At the end of the day this is a discussion forum and we are here to voice our opinnion, if you don't like it well don't read it.