Rev, I just don't think you can make the generalisations, or draw the conclusions, either side of the argument.
For better or worse however, fair or not, the cards are stacked against the player/celebrity. They are the role model, whether it is an alcohol fuelled pub brawl or a series of infidelities that become public e.g Tiger Woods. They will pay the price.
The difference is the player knows that all their fame, fortune, stature and great life-style is at stake if they mess up.
I'm not against a player physically defending themselves, but I am against violence. That means a proportionate response.
And a professional player needs to be smart enough to know if what they are risking in their response - is worth it. Some can deal with it. Some can't. Some stay away from the situation in the first place.
If a player is held out as a role model (and they know they are because they have it drilled into them), do you think the sort of response that entails the sort of injuries that were inflicted as we have seen in the photo, or like those that Russell Packer inflicted, are warranted? ...because they were provoked?? Is a member of the police force, who is also held out as a role model ...(and they know they are) permitted to inflict such an injury on a member of the public, and they expect society to accept it because he or she says they were provoked?? Police are provoked all the time.
Really, does a pub fight ever really turn out well? It's a time and place where everybody pretty much loses their better judgement. If you can't keep enough good judgement whilst drinking in a public place... then don't drink in public place. Do it at home.
And if our guy wasn't drinking, or affected by alcohol...well somehow that makes it worse.