What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Salary Cap

Status
Not open for further replies.

hineyrulz

Post Whore
Messages
148,906
I was thinking the same thing. Not really in the best interest of the club if board members are prepared to lose 4 points for their own personal interest. If this were true even if they finally agreed to changes to avoid the -4 they are not the type of people any organization would need on a board.
Well you have to think it has some legs considering how long it took for them to see reason.
 
Messages
255
Maybe because the change isn't a simple one and while your idea may get us out of trouble for 2016, the NRL could choose to rescind our NRL licence if we didn't maintain the changes (or impose any other penalty of their choosing).

Well said. I think the NRL has the upper hand. Just wish Sharp would stop speaking to the media. And stop listening to Tom Issa.
 

Suitman

Post Whore
Messages
55,040
Hopefully.

Gee I hope the bit about some directors resisting the electoral changes because they were worried about losing their spot is just something Proszenko made up.

It probably is a bit of both. It's something he has made up (knowing what our club is like and the politics behind it), but probably has a ring of truth about it as well. I don't think it would surprise anyone.

Suity
 

Bandwagon

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
41,998
Hopefully.

Gee I hope the bit about some directors resisting the electoral changes because they were worried about losing their spot is just something Proszenko made up.

If that is the case, then clearly they would be derelict in their duties as members of the board. Goes right to the heart of good governance and stuff.
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
85,127
I was thinking the same thing. Not really in the best interest of the club if board members are prepared to lose 4 points for their own personal interest. If this were true even if they finally agreed to changes to avoid the -4 they are not the type of people any organization would need on a board.

Agreed 100%. If this story is not true and we avoid the -4 then the board have acted well in this.

Good post Dibs.
 

jk13

First Grade
Messages
6,150
Yay! Go team! Parra no.1! Slowly the grim reaper crawls away cursing his opportunity for 2016
 

Basil Brush

Juniors
Messages
1,200
I have a very strong feeling that neither the NRL or our board wants us to start us on negative 4 points.

Hence I believe it will not happen.
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
and these are the idiots who decide whether we lose 4 points

http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...-appoint-the-correct-ceo-20160218-gmy4a7.html

More instability threatens NRL unless they appoint the correct CEO

Date
February 19, 2016 - 7:00PM

Roy Masters
Sports Columnist


Rugby league headquarters has been unstable for at least five years and has now descended to a dangerous level of inertia, paralysed by senior resignations and the failure to appoint a chief executive.

With the season kick-off two weeks away, the only consolation of an over-worked staff is that the commission now realise how hard they toil.

The administration of the game has been in a state of flux, even before talk of an independent commission surfaced in 2009. Squabbling among the states, NRL clubs and half owners, News Ltd, led to a compromised commission, devoid of corporate memory because it was decided no-one could serve on the board if that person had occupied a position in rugby league in the previous three years.

The negotiations between the distrusting parties was long and torturous but ultimately produced a much-improved structure for the governance than the Australian Rugby League-News co-ownership model where nothing was done if both parties could not agree.

The eight person commission delivered News' exit but it was also a very uncertain time with speculation about the continuing tenure of then CEO, David Gallop, which was a condition of News' exit. When the commission was finally formed in 2012, the relationship between Gallop and commission chair John Grant was testy and Gallop resigned.

There was no succession plan and Shane Mattiske became acting CEO for nine months. Dave Smith was appointed in early 2013 and lasted three years but during his stewardship, he turned over almost all of the senior management of the NRL, losing some good people like media man, John Brady.

A significant number of the new executives hired by Smith have not lasted, with Brady's successor (Sandy Olsen) gone, as well as Jim Doyle, Shane Richardson and Suzanne Young.

Couple this head office instability with the turnover of club bosses where in the past two years the following clubs have had new CEOs - Cowboys, Sea Eagles, Roosters, Wests Tigers, Panthers, Storm, Warriors, Eels and Sharks.

Compare this with the AFL which has been very stable at the top for a long time. It has a settled commission but more importantly it has had cohesion in its executive. The transition from the confrontational CEO Andrew Demetriou to his deputy, the consulting Gill McLachlan, was seamless, consolidating long-term relationships with clubs, continuity of strategy and long-held corporate knowledge.

The pattern in most mature Australian professional sports is stability – James Sutherland in cricket, John O'Neill during his first incarnation in rugby union, Kate Palmer at netball, John Coates with the Australian Olympic Committee.

It is now coming up to six months since Smith announced his resignation.

To be fair to Grant, he is taking his time because he wants to be certain of the commission's choice and some of the leading candidates needed to be wooed.

Grant seeks a CEO who is a skilled communicator, is strong on budgets and has a knowledge (and possible love) of rugby league.

The last quality, together with the effects of the paralysing delay, is why some NRL clubs are pushing for the appointment of NRL head of football, Todd Greenberg.

There is concern the appointment of an outsider - and the 12 to 18 months he or she will take to get up to speed - will prolong the instability.

Commissioners are interviewing candidates, comparing them to the insider, Greenberg, who appears comfortable with this process.

It would take a man who genuinely loved the game to agree with a process where he is being matched against all other candidates and then, if not chosen, remain in his current deputy's role.

So, if Greenberg is appointed to the CEO position, or resigns because he missed out, Grant will need a replacement for him.

The good news is that NRL clubs have probably never been more unified. Perhaps it is a residual result of their negotiations with Grant over funding where they acted as a unanimous bloc.

There have been significant strides forward and orderly turnover of staff is important but the absence of continuity at head office (and at clubs) has many league observers worried that the churn is acting to put the brakes on the growth and prosperity of the game.

This is why the commission's choice of CEO is crucial. Get the wrong person and the game will endure another five years of instability. Get it right and there is an opportunity to seize the momentum by reaping the rewards of the record broadcast deal and the government money available for stadia development.


http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/why-cant-the-nrl-find-a-ceo-20160218-gmx9t0.html

Why can't the NRL find a CEO?

Date
February 19, 2016 - 8:58PM

Chris Barrett
Sports Writer

"Why would I want to do that?" says one person who was approached by the Australian Rugby League Commission's headhunters about the vacant chief executive's position.

"I'd have to take a pay cut."

It was a question to which there could have been a few different answers: I'd have to take on the clubs; or, I'd have to be on the back page of the paper every second day; or even, given recent events: I'd have to take the call the next time a player performs a simulated sex act with a dog.

Hyperbole aside, whatever their reasons, there are a string of administrators from V8 Supercars boss James Warburton to Geelong Cats chief Brian Cook, who have been linked with the NRL's top job but want nothing to do with it.

Applicants from the league world were due to be interviewed by ARLC nominations committee members John Grant, Jeremy Sutcliffe, Catherine Harris and Wayne Pearce this week, and a shortlist of four is expected to be determined by the end of next week.

As the search beyond league circles continues one reason given to Fairfax Media for outsiders shunning the opportunity has been a supposedly limited anticipated base salary.

Much has been made about the highly-paid top executives inside League Central such as the now departed chief operating officer Suzanne Young and strategy chief Shane Richardson. In this respect there appears a comparative air of austerity in the corridors at Driver Avenue as the code winds towards appointing a successor to Dave Smith.

Sources say some potential CEO contenders were told the base pay would be in the range of $900,000 to $950,000 or more than $1 million for the "right" person.

That is less than the reported $1.5m Smith was on during his three years in charge but is certainly significantly more than what his predecessor David Gallop collected during his decade running the game. It would serve as a pay rise, and a good one, to anyone involved in the game.

Furthermore, it is not as badly out of kilter with the market, at least on the surface. According to the AFL's annual report of last year its chief executive Gill McLachlan's salary is on a base $1.3m. Australian Rugby Union chief Bill Pulver is on $735,885, according to the ARU's 2015 annual report. Cricket Australia's long-time CEO James Sutherland, meanwhile, is said to be on somewhere in the vicinity of $1.5m plus bonuses. It is that extra earning capacity that catapulted the previous AFL chief Andrew Demetriou's package to $3.8m in 2013. Of that lofty income, $2.33m was in bonuses and that is where McLachlan is ahead of the pack (although for perspective not as far ahead as NFL commissioner Roger Goodell, who it was revealed this week collected $US34m in 2014).

How a bonus structure would be put together for whoever the new NRL CEO is remains unclear but with the next broadcast deal already done there is no potential reward for locking those rivers of gold away.

A game which has a salary cap at its competitive core will not have one for its top job, though, insists ARLC chairman and interim CEO Grant, although it is a statement made with a slight caveat.

"We will pay the right salary for the right person," Grant told Fairfax Media. "But that needs to recognise our obligation to return as much revenue as possible back to the game.

"You have to remember that this is a complex and demanding job … there is no other job like it.

"People who have the capability to meet the demands of this role don't grow on trees. But we have had no pushback from candidates in terms of remuneration."

That may well be the case but there is no doubt the package that has been floated has been a deterrent for a certain level of external would-be CEOs approached during the search run by recruitment company Crown & Marks, as has the reputation of Grant as a micro-manager.

However, if the result is, as most with skin in the game are tipping, that a league official will land the job, then for once the clubland and head office will be in alignment.

Another interloper promises to create only more friction than there was during Smith's time, which is why there have been separate pushes among the clubs for Todd Greenberg and Jim Doyle.

Michael Brown, the NRL head of commercial and the CEO of next year's World Cup, is about as well credentialled a candidate as there is at League Central owing to his record in the AFL, football and cricket, but he is already charged with the next big-ticket item for the administration - growing non-broadcast revenue. Meanwhile, Warren Wilson, who resigned as Penrith group chief on Thursday, was told this week he would not be involved in the interview process.

With the game entering into a period of consolidation following the $1.9bn rights deal a steady and street-smart hand with a firm footing in the code is what clubs are plumping for.

"The game doesn't need an innovator right now, it just needs a stable figure and someone who can relate well with the clubs," one senior club figure said.

"The biggest problem with the NRL is they don't talk to the clubs."

Another said of Doyle, the former NRL COO to Smith and now the New Zealand Warriors chief: "He knows the commissioners, he knows the clubs. We trust him. He can bring us all back under the same tent."

If Greenberg, already inside the big tent, would be a bookmaker's favourite then Doyle would be the danger. A self-made multi-millionaire it is said that he did not always see eye to eye with Smith during his time at NRL headquarters before quitting for Auckland in 2014.

Doyle is also regarded as the kind of strong character who, with knowledge of Grant's shortcomings, would not be afraid to push back at a hands-on chairman.

Comfortably re-settled across the ditch the question the New Zealander would have to ask himself in the event he was offered the post is if he needs the drama.

An often thankless job, as Smith discovered almost from day one, it is not one where you can escape the blowtorch of public scrutiny for days at a time let alone weeks and months as is the case for someone like Sutherland, who has run cricket for nearly 15 years.

It brings to mind one of Gallop's parting remarks on his final day as CEO in 2012.

"The next person to last 10 years, I'll be the first person to take them to lunch."
 
Messages
255
Probably close to the most accurate article Prozcenko has written about the club in years.

Reckon so too. Those who have spoken to our Chairman either at games , the club or functions know that he can easily provide information. And in the last month he has spoken to a plethora of reporters. And I reckon the NRL have probably provide a bit of info too, maybe a way to tell sharp to shut up or just to force those insecure directors at the bottom of the voting list to flip. Or lose 4 points if you don't.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
74,095
Sorry but I cant access the article because of Rupert's paywall.

Anyway Rothfield says that we're sweet now with the -4 points thing.
 

Attachments

  • Clipboard01.jpg
    Clipboard01.jpg
    13.7 KB · Views: 16

eel speel

Juniors
Messages
286
Reckon so too. Those who have spoken to our Chairman either at games , the club or functions know that he can easily provide information. And in the last month he has spoken to a plethora of reporters. And I reckon the NRL have probably provide a bit of info too, maybe a way to tell sharp to shut up or just to force those insecure directors at the bottom of the voting list to flip. Or lose 4 points if you don't.

Those who know the club well know that Tom Issa controls those other 3 directors. They are have no idea about football,just like Issa. There are a lot of members who will think twice at the next election about voting for Issa, Corwell, Garrad or Gadiel.

Let's hope this gets resolved soon and we can start the season on the same as the other teams.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Top