RIP NRL

[Game_Breaker]

Exactly

So either Cummins didn't call 6 again and turnover right decision or he did call 6 again and turn over right decision as per the rules.

err no
he called 6 again so how is a turn over the right decision as per the rules?

Rules say he can’t change his decision

 

[Valheru]

err no
he called 6 again so how is a turn over the right decision as per the rules?

Rules say he can’t change his decision

But he didn't change his decision...

And if he did what do you think should happen from there? You are saying scrum to raiders and the rules clearly don't support that view.

 

[Game_Breaker]

But he didn't change his decision...

And if he did what do you think should happen from there? You are saying scrum to raiders and the rules clearly don't support that view.

honestly, wtf?


He didn't change his decision? lol

Yes, I'm saying scrum to the raiders. The rules say nothing about not supporting that view, you're a worse liar than Cummins

 

[carcharias]

He changed it to the correct ruling.

people whinge all day all night about refs getting it wrong.
This ref gets it wrong momentarily and then clearly corrects the call.

now people are whinging because the ref didn’t get it wrong.

FMD

 

[Valheru]

honestly, wtf?


He didn't change his decision? lol

Yes, I'm saying scrum to the raiders. The rules say nothing about not supporting that view, you're a worse liar than Cummins

The rules don't say it should either. They say referee has discretion and he didn't deem it to be a mutual infringement so turn over correct.

 

[Game_Breaker]

The rules don't say it should either. They say referee has discretion and he didn't deem it to be a mutual infringement so turn over correct.

Discretion is very different to saying the rules don’t support a scrum feed to the raiders, as per your claim

Do you understand the difference?
I can’t help you if you don’t

 

[Valheru]

Discretion is very different to saying the rules don’t support a scrum feed to the raiders, as per your claim

Do you understand the difference?
I can’t help you if you don’t

They don't support it as has been shown to you multiple times.

 

[taste2taste]

He changed it to the correct ruling.

people whinge all day all night about refs getting it wrong.
This ref gets it wrong momentarily and then clearly corrects the call.

now people are whinging because the ref didn’t get it wrong.

FMD

This ^^^^
I think 99% of fans would be happy that the correct decision was made even though it was an absolute mess, I can understand Raiders fans frustration. If it was my team I'd be checking the fine print of the rule book trying to see why it should have been 6 more.

The game wasn't changed by the refs but by Joey Leilua not passing to Rapana for an easy try, in taking the contact Leilua not only bombed a try but also hurt his ankle, when the Roosters went 60m to score it was because they ran through a hole left in the defensive line by Leilua. He was slow trying to limp back into position after making the previous tackle.

That decision not to pass cost the Raiders -12 points.

 

[Game_Breaker]

They don't support it as has been shown to you multiple times.

You’ve failed to show it at all

nowhere does it say it a ref affecting play by changing his mind is not a mutual infringement

please prove me wrong

 

[Valheru]

You’ve failed to show it at all

nowhere does it say it a ref affecting play by changing his mind is not a mutual infringement

please prove me wrong

Lol the negative doesn't need to be stated, the affirmative does.

Your assertion that it should have been a scrum is completely wrong as per the rules.

 

[Game_Breaker]

Lol the negative doesn't need to be stated, the affirmative does.

Your assertion that it should have been a scrum is completely wrong as per the rules.

You said before it’s up to the referees discretion, now you’re saying it’s against the rules

You can’t even be honest and admit Cummins changed the call

a terrible troll

 

[Valheru]

You said before it’s up to the referees discretion, now you’re saying it’s against the rules

You can’t even be honest and admit Cummins changed the call

a terrible troll

Comprehension clearly is not a strength of yours.

 

[SBD82]

If you can’t see the difference between a ref making an incorrect call, and overturning an incorrect call where it is against the rules of the game for him to do so, you’re a dumbmerkin and there’s no help for you.

 

[T-Boon]

Why are people still going on about last seasons GF?

 

[Maximus]

But he didn't change his decision

What?

And this guy whinges incessantly about how the refs rob the Roosters by the way

 

[kdalymc]

f**k there is some morons in here. Who gives a f**k if it was right decision or not, the point is he waved 6 again so the raiders held the f**ken ball

 

[King hit]

Why does everyone keep predicting Rugby League will end one day? it's rubbish it never will.

Rugby league is in pretty good shape compared to the utter shit union is. The ARU keep digging their grave even deeper year by year and I didn't think that was remotely possible.

 

[Valheru]

What?

And this guy whinges incessantly about how the refs rob the Roosters by the way

I was responding to someone who said the rule book was irrelevant due to Cummins saying he didn't call 6 again.

And no I don't.

 

[Legion]

He changed it to the correct ruling.

people whinge all day all night about refs getting it wrong.
This ref gets it wrong momentarily and then clearly corrects the call.

now people are whinging because the ref didn’t get it wrong.

FMD

The attacking team sees the ref waving his arm '6 again' & responded accordingly.
There's no way that a player would hear a ref overturning the ruling during play over the roar of the crowd [Not to forget that the refs are always telling us that they can't reverse a decision, so what player would be expecting him to?]
If the ref wants to change his mind, would it not have been correct then to at least take it back to replay the 5th tackle?

 

[carcharias]

The attacking team sees the ref waving his arm '6 again' & responded accordingly.
There's no way that a player would hear a ref overturning the ruling during play over the roar of the crowd [Not to forget that the refs are always telling us that they can't reverse a decision, so what player would be expecting him to?]
If the ref wants to change his mind, would it not have been correct then to at least take it back to replay the 5th tackle?

you reckon they aren’t listening/watching the ref?

ha

how do they know to run at the dude that the ref has called offside?

90% of those players knew he’d called last tackle ...regardless of it being wrong or right you always play the whistle.

My only real argument is people saying this cost the raiders the game.
It didn’t
No way
No how