Genuinely interested in what people see in Kyle? Tries hard.. that's great.. but so does Lawrie, for example. What about his actual output/ability makes people think we will be anywhere near competitive with the top sides in the competition in say 1, 2 or 3 years time with Kyle in the side? What point of difference does Kyle bring? People say he can organise.. based on what? His unremarkable attacking play and lack of spark does not automatically make him an "organising half". We constantly in fact look disjointed, unorganised, unimaginative and directionless. Add to this he doesn't have a long kicking game, a good pass selection/vision.. he doesn't bring much to the side at all in my view. As I said, tries hard, but what about his actual game makes him above reserve grade standard.. and more to the point, what about him makes him a potential contributor to an actual top 4 team in future as that is where we should want to be going?