hillbillyjazzer1954
Juniors
- Messages
- 1,695
sorry double post
Last edited:
I agree. They could easily have been 1-5.
However the storm WILL NOT GET THE SPOON.
They have too good of a side to get the spoon. Inglis, Slater, Cronk, Smith are individuals that will win games.
Does anyone else think that Folau is a bigger loss than thought? He gave them a 5th tackle option EVERY SET and is a very good centre.
Tiger Nick, pretty harsh about the Storm putting 40 on us if they switched on. You're a half empty kind of bloke I see?
mate i was stoked with the effort last night. however you have to admit the storm were very very average by their standards. cooper cronk had probably his worst ever game in first grade.
what i meant was that the storm had enough field position and possession to win by some margain if they were switched on and we played to our usual. imo if the storm play to their best they probably beat us, but we go down with a fight.
maybe our committed defence forced them into error, and considering im pretty stoked with the win, i think ill stick to that.
Laurie Daley on the Hooker battle: "Split decision. Robbie Farah was good but Cameron Smith more than held his own given the Tigers forwards dominated. If you put Cameron Smith in tthhe Tigers' side he would have been one of the standout players."
Am I being biased (I know I am bias, just wondering in this instance) or is that a pretty rough appraisal? I can cop a split decision., but seriously, Smith had more than enough chances to exert his influence on the game. Farah played a pivotal role in our first two tries. Where was Smith all game?
There were times when our forwards were getting absolutely dominated in the second half!
Based on that, Ennis is on for origin.