Like skeepe said, you can judge a Raiders performance by the first ten minutes. If they start well, I expect them to be far too strong for the Tigers. If they bumble around, the Tigers may scrape a victory together.
Oh yes if only :lol: I guess you will just have to settle for another year of "rebuilding" and mediocrity.
I'm under no illusions that the Tigers are a top team but they're hardly as feeble as you make them out to be. I'd be more concerned about your pathetic Broncos.
Yep, an unfathomable prediction at best.
The suggestion is that if the Raiders play well, the Tigers aren't on the same level as the Raiders. I'm sure most would find that more than a little absurd.
Those that would find it absurd would be the same people who know f**k all about rugby league. Those with an ability to analyse the game would find it pretty much spot on.
Yeah, you're right. If the Raiders play well, the Tigers will have no hope of matching the Tigers. Tell that to the bookies who have us 4th favourite to win, favourites in this match and the 58% of the people in this poll that voted Tigers.Those that would find it absurd would be the same people who know f**k all about rugby league. Those with an ability to analyse the game would find it pretty much spot on.
As has been said, you'll know the result of this in the opening 10 minutes
If the Raiders are holding the ball and playing good footy, expect a close game at worst but probably a comfortable raiders win... if we're playing like dog sh*t, Tigers by plenty.
Not confident, but even against the Tigers playing their absolute best, if the Raiders complete 75% of our sets, we'll be in the game all day... if we complete 75% and the Tigers are even a bit off, we'll roll them comfortably
What happens when Benji's shoulder busts into 74 pieces in the first minute?