Papa_smurf
Juniors
- Messages
- 506
im not saying it doesnt happen, im saying that it isnt allowedRainMan said:That already happens though...
im not saying it doesnt happen, im saying that it isnt allowedRainMan said:That already happens though...
Papa_smurf said:it was to allow SOME forward passes, like 2 or 4 per team per game.
dont represent things so negatively champ, its unfair
Copa said:To repeat myself....
If RL switches to 11 per team... rugby union will then switch to 13...
NRL.... don't do it.
axl rose said:What are you his hairdresser? for fu$k sake
Copa said:This means rugby union can also drop 2 players to become rugby league.
fourplay said:I actually think this is an awsome idea.
atm the games are played out of dummy half. We would see a lot more ball movement, more space, more linebreaks.
Misty Bee said:I agree. Get rid of 2 players and you'll impove the code heaps.
Get rid of 2 benchies. 13 a side - 2 interchanges - stops forward domination in defence, brings back opportunities for nippy halves and fleet footed backs.
11 a side league would have to be trialled, I guess, and I'll reserve judgement until I see a lot of it to see what it really means. However, I reckon the props are safe as a species. There will always be someone stationed on the wing. To me, it's goodbye lock, goodbye pivot.