What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

'13 | R22 | Sat | Sharks 14-18 Knights | Remondis

Round 22: Sharks v Knights

  • Draw after golden point

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    8
  • Poll closed .

meercat

Juniors
Messages
810
So happy to win that one, keeps us well and truly in the 8 for the moment also winning on the wrong end of a 7-3 penalty count, can't remember the last time we managed that.
 

Apey

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
28,277
1149067_499801246774508_647140325_n.jpg


Dat high-shot!
 

Big Pete

Referee
Messages
29,115
Determined win by the Knights.

Looked like it was game over when Kurt made that dreadful mistake but some enterprising play from Mullen and the backs made a big difference. After a nervous start, Gagai once again featured in the clutch. He's a special talent and it's good to see him perform when it counts.

Decent game. I don't think either team showed their finals credentials, it was just a middle of the competition game.
 

DOGSvsEELS

Juniors
Messages
1,840
sharks are a joke! lose with 7-3 penalty count fmd! their attack is very average, carney can't carry this sides attack on his own.

they have some real average backs & expect worse next year with ayshford! they just stood there watching that last kick especially wright, he was f**kin shit tonight!

& gordon is not the greatest attacking fb, should sell some forwards & buy some good backs.

expect both sides to be knocked out first week of the finals.

btw boyd is one of the laziest pos i've seen! if he tried half as hard as he does in soo the knights would be so much better. so many times this year he gets the ball from fb & looks for his wingers to do his job, just look how hard he runs the ball back in soo.
 

Rhino_NQ

Immortal
Messages
33,050
only got to follow this on the fox sports match tracker. Did darius not get a penalty thenget up and sook and take 5 minutes to play the ball after it atleast once?
 

Fufu Andronez

First Grade
Messages
8,464
Gallen and fifitas 100 tackles and 100 hit ups look great on paper but they don't let Carney and Robson get enough of the ball and set up some plays.

Leave it to Carney and Robson in the opposition 20 and let them put you through the holes.
 

jonno_knights

Juniors
Messages
2,147
Gallen and fifitas 100 tackles and 100 hit ups look great on paper but they don't let Carney and Robson get enough of the ball and set up some plays.

Leave it to Carney and Robson in the opposition 20 and let them put you through the holes.

Cause their 14 combined offloads doesn't provide the platform for the Sharks creative/fast men to make something against a retreating/staggered defensive line?

Sharks really need to look into some players that can take advantage of the second phase play! their backs are all quite easily contained.
 

wibble

Bench
Messages
4,661
Gallen and fifitas 100 tackles and 100 hit ups look great on paper but they don't let Carney and Robson get enough of the ball and set up some plays.

Leave it to Carney and Robson in the opposition 20 and let them put you through the holes.

People (many Sharks fans included) keep saying this, but Gallen and Fifita gave Carney and Robson plenty of territory. Gallen and Fifita also made 14 offloads between them, nearly twice as many as every other player from both teams. They gave our halves a bucket load of chances. If Carney or Robson want the ball more or at a crucial stage, they are the halves, its up to them to call it.

Not only were they poor in kicking and last play options, which happens every few weeks, but the kick chase was terrible. Our kicks were Newcastle's best attacking weapon coming out of their half.

We were only in the game due to the huge metres of a few of our players, the Knights as a team, were much better. If Mullen plays like that and they defend well, they can trouble any one.

Sharks have been much poorer this year against good sides than last year, and the lack of quality backs is really being exposed by good coaches. Even so, if we don't drop the ball so often we can win games just on our forward power.
 

Fufu Andronez

First Grade
Messages
8,464
Cause their 14 combined offloads doesn't provide the platform for the Sharks creative/fast men to make something against a retreating/staggered defensive line?

Sharks really need to look into some players that can take advantage of the second phase play! their backs are all quite easily contained.

Yeah true actually, more runs = more offloads imagine if they had a Segeyaro to jump on those.
 

Joker's Wild

Coach
Messages
17,894
sharks are a joke! lose with 7-3 penalty count fmd! their attack is very average, carney can't carry this sides attack on his own.

they have some real average backs & expect worse next year with ayshford! they just stood there watching that last kick especially wright, he was f**kin shit tonight!

& gordon is not the greatest attacking fb, should sell some forwards & buy some good backs.

expect both sides to be knocked out first week of the finals.

btw boyd is one of the laziest pos i've seen! if he tried half as hard as he does in soo the knights would be so much better. so many times this year he gets the ball from fb & looks for his wingers to do his job, just look how hard he runs the ball back in soo.

Boyd not retuning the ball has been discussed by Knights fans before and it has been revealed that its part of the game plan. Basically he gets it to his wingers, who are 2 of the most effective ball returners in the game, in order to make himself available for a dummy half scoot on the next play. It's actually pretty effective 90% of the time and makes good yardage
 

Latest posts

Top