Nice work Tone, reeled a few of the boys in with that tripe.
check again, it wasn't tone reeling them in.
Nice work Tone, reeled a few of the boys in with that tripe.
Brett stewart and lyon are the only certain somebodies.
I said 3 because watmough was somebody and foran and dce are gonna be somebodies so altogether they equal a somebody.
Glenn stewart is shit, never would be talked about if he wasn't snakes brother. Kite is nothing. I genuinely don't even know who king is. Enough said on that. Wolfman is truly one of the worst first graders in history, idiotic rep selections that go on to prove to be idiotic don't make a player good. Matai is a could have been, if he wasn't made of glass. Ballin is a little nugget of worthless turd. Does that about cover it?
Look maybe if I didn't hate manly so much I'd concede on dce, foran, watmough, and possibly even matai, but I do hate manly so this is where we're at. The others would be nobodies on any team though, and thats just objective honesty.
1. False
2. No thanks. If he was any good I would have noticed him by now. Premiership passenger and another example of the bone headedness of blues selectors. None of that suggests he can play.
check again, it wasn't tone reeling them in.
He wouldnt have played over 210 first grade games been a premiership and origin player and captain if he couldnt play. At Souths he would but not at one of the top 2-3 clubs of the last decade.
Wolfman makes your argument invalid. Evidently its possible to achieve a lot without being able to play.
Yeah I've heard of him because of his beard, the very same reason he got picked for rep footy. You seem very naive like there is no human error involved in rep selections. Like a robot is just objectively selecting the best players. Unfortunately it doesn't work like that. Wolfman is objectively better than no one, but yes it was quite the beard he had.
Yeah I've heard of him because of his beard, the very same reason he got picked for rep footy.