What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

'13 | Women in League R10 | Sun | Sharks 30-20 Raiders | Sharks

Round 10: Sharks v Raiders


  • Total voters
    16
  • Poll closed .

skeepe

Immortal
Messages
48,373
Forward pass and the score ends

30-20, a fitting scoreline i think, one try and goal kicking the difference.

And that try wouldn't have been a try against any other team.

I'm not too upset, some very positive signs and we played the majority of the game without McCrone and Fensom, which would have drastically changed the game plan.

TheSharks are a great side with a lot of depth, no shame losing to them.
 

northwest9

Juniors
Messages
1,864
Despite the failures getting the rub of the green on every call, I'm stunned, every halfwit raiders fan I've spoken to in the last week has left me convinced the failures will not lose another game all season, decade even

I mean, they beat an exhausted Melbourne who didn't care for the game, and a geniused pack of nuffies from Newcastle, surely that makes them unstoppable and obvious premiership favourites.? Right?
 

Chief_Chujo

First Grade
Messages
8,136
Milf, vaughan and wighton all looked good today. Hard to not get excited even after the loss.

But yea were just making up the numbers until we fix our defence
 

Raider_69

Post Whore
Messages
61,174
And that try wouldn't have been a try against any other team.

I'm not too upset, some very positive signs and we played the majority of the game without McCrone and Fensom, which would have drastically changed the game plan.

TheSharks are a great side with a lot of depth, no shame losing to them.


Agreed.
Sharkies too good for us today, Todd Carney was fantastic, no shame in falling short there, both sides with some key injuries

Raiders lacked a bit of polish at times and the goal line defense needs serious work, outside of that, it was ok. Milford had by far his best game in grade and that is probably as big a positive as we could expect to get. He's a special kid
 

mongoose

Coach
Messages
11,853
geez our defence is poor. I hope Furner knows he can't rely on out scoring the opposition in every game. It isn't 2005 anymore.
 

9701

First Grade
Messages
5,400
Remember two weeks ago when some certain Raiders fans were laughing that the Kinigts didn't beat the Sharks without Gallen (disregarding we lost mullen had no Buderus Scott or Smith) Yet a basicallfull strength Faiders team couldn't beat the sharkies with no gallen AND Lewis.

This is why we lol @ Faiders fans.
 

Pete Cash

Post Whore
Messages
62,165
Remember two weeks ago when some certain Raiders fans were laughing that the Kinigts didn't beat the Sharks without Gallen (disregarding we lost mullen had no Buderus Scott or Smith) Yet a basicallfull strength Faiders team couldn't beat the sharkies with no gallen AND Lewis.

This is why we lol @ Faiders fans.

But...we absolutely raped you guys last week...so you are actually lolling at the knights. Sorry m8
 

WaznTheGreat

Referee
Messages
24,421
Remember two weeks ago when some certain Raiders fans were laughing that the Kinigts didn't beat the Sharks without Gallen (disregarding we lost mullen had no Buderus Scott or Smith) Yet a basicallfull strength Faiders team couldn't beat the sharkies with no gallen AND Lewis.

This is why we lol @ Faiders fans.

Raiders 44
Knights 14
 

Latest posts

Top