'14 // R1 // Fri // Bulldogs 12-18 Broncos // ANZ

[BranVan3000]

Dogs didn't deserve to have that disallowed, pathetic defensive effort

 

[Tommy Smith]

Wow. ..

The precedent has been set as Gus said.

That will revolutionize attacking play the rest of the year.

They've decided you can now run behind players.

 

[Delboy]

A common sense decision , Gus did his usual nonsense.

This stuffed my tipping 0 from 2

 

[lockyno1]

Hahahaha how bad must you be even Maranta scored!

 

[tomdl]

Those should always be given a try provided there is no contact with the defenders. Gould is just holding on to it so he can cry about the Hodges origin try

 

[Swarzey]

Guis, Broncos will be top 8 this year! Back to the finals for the mighty Broncos!

 

[johns_reds]

If that was roosters or Souths Gould will be saying how good that decoy run was

( not decoy, wrong word, but Gould would be saying it should be play on as it didn't affect play, he is biased douche )

 

[BranVan3000]

That's a bad decision, and one not backed up by the laws of the game.

Agreed wrong call

 

[Joker's Wild]

Common sense prevails

 

[Jason Maher]

The rules of the game are (and always have been) that you can't run behind your own player.

 

[Canard]

There is no such rule as shepherd.

There was no interference it's a fair try.

Gould making up a fake controversy to suit his bias, he has been riding the Dogs home.

 

[BranVan3000]

Wow. ..

The precedent has been set as Gus said.

That will revolutionize attacking play the rest of the year.

They've decided you can now run behind players.

Seriously never should have been a try

Hasler needs to blow up

 

[KeepingTheFaith]

Broncos just need to get it down the other end. Dogs aren't going long range.

 

[skeepe]

The fact that the defenders had to decide between two players to cover is enough of an impediment to disallow the try.

The decision is wrong according to the laws of the game.

 

[Canard]

The rules of the game are (and always have been) that you can't run behind your own player.

100% incorrect.

 

[nick87]

i've never known a game of RL where it was ok to run behind your own player. Regardless of who was impeded or not impeded that has ALWAYS been an instant penalty. Terrible decision

 

[KeepingTheFaith]

Lol dogs

 

[carlosthedwarf]

Both of these teams are atrocious

 

[Aragorn]

useless.

 

[Didgi]

The fact that the defenders had to decide between two players to cover is enough of an impediment to disallow the try.

The decision is wrong according to the laws of the game.

Defenders have to choose between 13 players every play. Correct call, defence wasn't impeded.