'16 | R4 | Sat | SYD 20-22 MAN | Allianz

[Valheru]

The roosters have their defficiencies...many of them but they were completely robbed with that decision tonight. Everyone knows that was a fair try.

 

[Valheru]

Nah. Blame the refs, it's all Roosters fans ever do. Last year it was because they never won penalty counts, now they're winning them but it's still the refs fault. The rorters had basically every 50-50 call go their way except the offside call for the final no try yet they'll bitch and moan about how the refs cost them the game.

No one blamed the ref for any other loss this year you imbecile.

Good to see you admit it was a fair try

 

[Maximus]

The roosters have their defficiencies...many of them but they were completely robbed with that decision tonight. Everyone knows that was a fair try.

Both feet need to be behind the ball. You can't conclusively say that his front foot was behind the ball.

No one blamed the ref for any other loss this year you imbecile.

Good to see you admit it was a fair try

Bit hard to blame the refs when you lose 40-0 and 42-10.

 

[Nice Beaver]

The roosters have their defficiencies...many of them but they were completely robbed with that decision tonight. Everyone knows that was a fair try.

You got a try off a forward pass too.

Convenient to forget that though.

Oh, the humanity!! :crazy:

 

[Valheru]

You got a try off a forward pass too.

Convenient to forget that though.

Oh, the humanity!! :crazy:

It wasn't forgotten because it didn't happen

 

[firechild]

Good to see you admit it was a fair try

You're a special kind of stupid. Saying it was a 50-50 call that didn't go their way isn't even close to admitting it was a fair try. It was so close that it was always going to stay with the on-field call which was no try in this case.

 

[Valheru]

Both feet need to be behind the ball. You can't conclusively say that his front foot was behind the ball.



Bit hard to blame the refs when you lose 40-0 and 42-10.

It was conclusive that he was onside.

The other game we lost was by 1 point. No one blamed the ref.

 

[OVP]

f**k the offside call ... dems da breaks, it was a very close call and they made the call.

What's pissing me off more than anything as a Roosters fan is the freaking imbecile who released Maloney to keep Dogboy instead.

Rule number one is you NEVER EVER EVER release your goalkicker. He stays until retirement.

 

[Valheru]

You're a special kind of stupid. Saying it was a 50-50 call that didn't go their way isn't even close to admitting it was a fair try. It was so close that it was always going to stay with the on-field call which was no try in this case.

It wasn't 50-50 though. It was 100-0 that went in favour of the 0

 

[firechild]

It wasn't 50-50 though. It was 100-0 that went in favour of the 0

BS. His front foot could well have been in front of the kicker, in fact, it probably was. Given the angle the camera was at, there is no way you could say for sure either way.

 

[Valheru]

BS. His front foot could well have been in front of the kicker, in fact, it probably was. Given the angle the camera was at, there is no way you could say for sure either way.

It wasn't in front. It is proven by the footage. Clearly onside.

 

[Nice Beaver]

It wasn't in front. It is proven by the footage. Clearly onside.

Guess what?

You lost. Had plenty of chances to win and didn't.

You got 50/50 calls and some you didn't.

Continue with the meltdown and enjoy your zero points

 

[Jack_Napier]

Lol both sides are scrubs we just suck a lot worse than manly do.

We shouldnt be blaming a call not going our way for the loss. We had it but imploded when manly ran in 3 tries in quick succession. When a bang average forward like Lussick runs through you don't deserve to win.

Feel for SST and SKD, our best yet again and don't deserve some of the pea hearted efforts others like guerra and Tupou and Evans are putting.

 

[Valheru]

Guess what?

You lost. Had plenty of chances to win and didn't.

You got 50/50 calls and some you didn't.

Continue with the meltdown and enjoy your zero points

As i said we have loads of deficiencies. As for those chances, we took one of them and it was unfairly denied.

 

[Unscrupulous]

Lol he was clearly onside. Anyone saying otherwise is just taking the piss.

 

[nomis88]

Gutsy win to Manly, considering the completely biased refereeing decisions against them tonight.

 

[nomis88]

Who will SKD take his frustrations out on tonight?

 

[Jack_Napier]

Who will SKD take his frustrations out on tonight?

Stay classy broseph

You'd think a fan of a side with Brett Stewart in it would steer clear of this type of shit banter. And for the record I making reference to Brett Stewart having to endure false allegations like SKD had to.

 

[slamminsam246]

Lol he was clearly onside. Anyone saying otherwise is just taking the piss.

If he was "clearly" onside it would have been reversed and/or gone as a try on field. It wasnt. So youre clearly wrong. Roosters got a 50/50 try and were denied a 50/50 try. Less bad team won. Suck it up

 

[Jerkwad2000]

It wasn't in front. It is proven by the footage. Clearly onside.

Aubusson may have been onside - but Daniel Tupou wasn't. Go back and watch the footage.Tupou is 4-5m in front of the kicker on the 2nd kick and then gets involved in the play. That makes HIM offside regardless of what happens with Aubusson, as it was clearly ruled the Manly player didn't play at the ball and thus Tupou was never played onside, and can only be played onside by the person that kicks the ball.