'16 | R4 | Sat | SYD 20-22 MAN | Allianz

[nomis88]

Stay classy broseph

You'd think a fan of a side with Brett Stewart in it would steer clear of this type of shit banter. And for the record I making reference to Brett Stewart having to endure false allegations like SKD had to.

Yeah I'll stay classy like the Roosters fans who cheered when DCE was injured. Or the Roosters fan who headbutted me after the game, think he'd be used to losing after losing four straight. And for the record Aubusson looked offside to me.

 

[Sea_Eagles_Rock]

Aubusson may have been onside - but Daniel Tupou wasn't. Go back and watch the footage.Tupou is 4-5m in front of the kicker on the 2nd kick and then gets involved in the play. That makes HIM offside regardless of what happens with Aubusson, as it was clearly ruled the Manly player didn't play at the ball and thus Tupou was never played onside, and can only be played onside by the person that kicks the ball.

That's exactly my line of thought through whole decision. Tupou was never onside. The 2nd kicker never ran through and was not put him onside. He was within 10m as he was 5m in front of the 2nd kick that landed to his right.

I still don't agree with the pass on the try before either.

 

[Nice Beaver]

As i said we have loads of deficiencies. As for those chances, we took one of them and it was unfairly denied.

9 -3 penalty count.

Finished with 15 players.

Right decision on the no try.

Enjoy the duck egg.

 

[Patorick]

That's exactly my line of thought through whole decision. Tupou was never onside. The 2nd kicker never ran through and was not put him onside. He was within 10m as he was 5m in front of the 2nd kick that landed to his right.

I still don't agree with the pass on the try before either.

 

[Danny-Boy]

Roosters to announce a new sponsor....Coke Zero :lol:

 

[reanimate]

Praise Lord Barrett, the man is a genius.

 

[Tenacious Titans]

Manly 2/2 with B Stewart

 

[oval]

f**ken boolshit ya cockeral cuns get a frikken dog up ya ya whinging poofy fux. f**ken offside and got all the penalties ya no wins cunbag cockadoodledoo steggles for dinner shitcans. f**ken cook us up a roast then gies a peek at ya purple pussflange ooh yeh its chicken tonight-ah!

 

[Tenacious Titans]

f**ken boolshit ya cockeral cuns get a frikken dog up ya ya whinging poofy fux. f**ken offside and got all the penalties ya no wins cunbag cockadoodledoo steggles for dinner shitcans. f**ken cook us up a roast then gies a peek at ya purple pussflange ooh yeh its chicken tonight-ah!

jesus christ

 

[mave]

Big night , oval ??

 

[Valheru]

Aubusson may have been onside - but Daniel Tupou wasn't. Go back and watch the footage.Tupou is 4-5m in front of the kicker on the 2nd kick and then gets involved in the play. That makes HIM offside regardless of what happens with Aubusson, as it was clearly ruled the Manly player didn't play at the ball and thus Tupou was never played onside, and can only be played onside by the person that kicks the ball.

Tupou didn't get involved in the play.

The bunker ruled aubo was offside which was clearly not the case.

 

[Danish]

f**ken boolshit ya cockeral cuns get a frikken dog up ya ya whinging poofy fux. f**ken offside and got all the penalties ya no wins cunbag cockadoodledoo steggles for dinner shitcans. f**ken cook us up a roast then gies a peek at ya purple pussflange ooh yeh its chicken tonight-ah!

:alcho:

 

[Babyface O'reilly]

It was clearly a try but I'm not too fussed as we have bigger issues. We won a rare penalty count and by some margin but failed to capitalise. Goal line defence was sh1t and we can't kick a goal to save ourselves. Congrats Manly.

 

[The Beaver]

Tupou was a mile offside and proceeded to make himself available to receive the last pass, thereby becoming involved. Obvious penalty any day of the week.

 

[Jerkwad2000]

Tupou didn't get involved in the play.

The bunker ruled aubo was offside which was clearly not the case.

Plenty of times you have seen penalties given/tries disallowed when players have been inside the 10m after being in front of kickers, even when not directly involved in the play. Tupou was right next to Mitchell when the pass was given and was therefore inside the 10m. Just like last week in the Dogs/Eels game, maybe not the correct "decision" but certainly the correct outcome.

 

[Valheru]

Plenty of times you have seen penalties given/tries disallowed when players have been inside the 10m after being in front of kickers, even when not directly involved in the play. Tupou was right next to Mitchell when the pass was given and was therefore inside the 10m. Just like last week in the Dogs/Eels game, maybe not the correct "decision" but certainly the correct outcome.

I disagree he was involved.

Anyways was mitchell not the kicker thus running tupou onside? Serious question as to under what circumstances tupou is made onside if he in fact was the one to be ruled offside.

 

[Maximus]

It wasn't in front. It is proven by the footage. Clearly onside.

Can you provide a screenshot of this footage that clearly shows him onside?

We won a rare penalty count

You've won 3 out of 4 this season, and the other was 9-9 or 9-8 depending on where you look.

 

[Valheru]

Can you provide a screenshot of this footage that clearly shows him onside?

No need to post it. The angle the video ref reviewed was clear.

 

[coolsteve]

Bunker says noooooo

 

[Maximus]

No need to post it. The angle the video ref reviewed was clear.

So that is a no you can't provide it?

If the angle was so clear, you could have just posted it.