What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

'16 | R9 | Sun | CRO 30-28 BRI | SCGS

Round 9: Sharks v Broncos


  • Total voters
    31
  • Poll closed .

macavity

Referee
Messages
20,661
How the hell was that a try when the Knights got one taken off them for less contact yesterday?

Oh thats right, look at the teams involved.
 

butchmcdick

Post Whore
Messages
52,296
How the f**k is that a try when every other try in these circumstances gets pulled back for obstruction
 

skeepe

Immortal
Messages
48,316
That is literally exactly how the ball looked when Papalii scored yesterday. They said that it was conclusively on the ground today, yesterday they said conclusively that it wasn't.

Go figure.

Also, Ennis was very clearly obstructed there.
 

Hauff

Juniors
Messages
203
If possession evens up, which means we have the majority this half, we can make a game of this.

Gallen sooking to the ref is always a good sign.
 

strong_latte

Juniors
Messages
1,665
Is it just me or is the obstruction rule just very hard to understand. I saw 2 obstructions in that last play that were probably worse than those called in the last game
 

Leber

Bench
Messages
3,959
That shouldnt have been a try based on the consistancy of the tries disallowed so far.

Broncos very lucky.
 

Maximus

Coach
Messages
14,054
How was that a try but the Benji one was disallowed earlier? He hit Ennis on the outside shoulder.

Oh Broncos right.
 

mxlegend99

Referee
Messages
23,334
How far do they want to go back to call obstruction, its a tricky one but that could've been disallowed under the current interpretation.
Did you watch the try disallowed by the Dragons today? That was more of a try then the Broncos one.
 

Hauff

Juniors
Messages
203
How the f**k is that a try when every other try in these circumstances gets pulled back for obstruction

Nope, that was consistent with the ruling the other night when they decided to throw out the black and white rulings by saying the contact was two players inside the ball receiver. Common sense starting to prevail.
 

Latest posts

Top