ground zero
Juniors
- Messages
- 347
When the Sharks become the Perth Sharks they will have to turn the porch light back on for Harold Halt. Nil Premierships.
The Sharks are going to cost you more then $100MI think so. Let's say Perth miss out on 18 and the Force fold. Forester does a deal with the government where he chips in 10% of a new stadium, then buys the Sharks licence for 100 million- WA Sharks.
Attendances are irrelevant when the bulk of the game's revenue is provided by the broadcasters. On this front there's a clear demand for a third Brisbane team. The introduction of the Dolphins increased the average FTA viewership for all NRL games in Brisbane from 98k to 111k.Irrelevant what everyone else is getting. It’s very clear that two clubs is enough for brisbane demand for the next few years, if not forever. When dolphins and broncos are getting close to filling Suncorp then it would be clear there is demand starting to outstrip supply. there is no reason what so ever RL fans in Logan or ipswich can’t be supporting any of the three nrl seq clubs that are there now
The WA Gov and business community had decades to convince a struggling Sydney club to relocate to Perth. Peter Cumins could have attempted to buy a stake in club and moved some games to Perth. Peter Holmes à Court managed to buy a stake in the Rabbitohs.A club would only move if they had financial need, and the nrl has made sure no one will ever have that financial need.nfl is privately owned pure business. Owners dont care about the fanbase or tradition, just in how much money it’s making.
The Sharks were the headline act for the 45k that went to Optus.Problem is for PR every club is sound especially his beloved Sharks
He was too busy watching the fumbleball.The Sharks were the headline act for the 45k that went to Optus.
It's a shame he couldn't be there.
Relocating a Sydney team to Perth is like bringing in Perth instead of Brisbane 3. Perth is just a meaningless dot on a map that will require decades of investment.Forget relocation, no Sydney club will move, let alone move to perth... you can shove that idea into the bin with all the other dumb ones that get brought up... if the force or super rugby fold in some way, twiggy can drop his breakaways and port over as the WA team, nothing changes for them other than the tweaked rules, and a better competition to play in, Sydney having the same amount of clubs as AFL in Melbourne, that will never change and the traditional teams of the comp all stem from Sydney, it would be madness to relocate any of them, its like throwing away history just to add a dot on a map, not when we can support 20+ teams anyways
There's not much history in Cronulla mate.Forget relocation, no Sydney club will move, let alone move to perth... you can shove that idea into the bin with all the other dumb ones that get brought up... if the force or super rugby fold in some way, twiggy can drop his breakaways and port over as the WA team, nothing changes for them other than the tweaked rules, and a better competition to play in, Sydney having the same amount of clubs as AFL in Melbourne, that will never change and the traditional teams of the comp all stem from Sydney, it would be madness to relocate any of them, its like throwing away history just to add a dot on a map, not when we can support 20+ teams anyways
The Sharks were the headline act for the 45k that went to Optus.
It's a shame he couldn't be there.
Well in modern history it is recorded that the British landed in Kurranulla in 1770.There's not much history in Cronulla mate.
I know it's hindsight but do think they should of merged the Brisbane BRL teams instead of having te Broncos.Obviously you don't know Brisbane, it's much bigger than Perth and that's without Ipswich, Logan and Northern suburbs. I bet you didn't realise that Redcliffe isn't even actually part of Brisbane and it's measured population..
I consider it Brisbane along with Ipswich ect, the same as Parramatta is Sydney.
But Brisbane could easily host 4 successful clubs- easily. And I'm not advocating for it, the Dolphins deserve 10 to 20 years without another rival.
And I'd probably be comfortable with 2 super clubs to be fair.
But it will likely have a 3rd at some point for sure.
Yes!I know it's hindsight but do think they should of merged the Brisbane BRL teams instead of having te Broncos.
Won a comp in 2016, warriors and gold coast havent done it, equal with cows, tigers and dragons, are we tossing their history too?There's not much history in Cronulla mate.
Well, we certainly align on those 3 places the game needs to expand to.
Although it isn't a popular opinion, I'd prefer a very strong 18 apposed to 20 which require 2 Sydney clubs to move to Perth and Adelaide.
There's too many Sydney clubs.
Sharks to WA and Tigers to SA would be ideal.. a lot of people will complain! The example of this working is the Brisbane Bears but why stop there? NFL franchisees move all the time, recently the Raiders ( Oakland LA ) moved out to Vegas .. now they have their own city!!!
Hahaha I meant the sharksWell in modern history it is recorded that the British landed in Kurranulla in 1770.
In there they claimed New Holland as their own.
That's just the European side
I can try and give you an account of the previous 70,000 years but I'm afraid I'd miss something.
They're just moving bro.Won a comp in 2016, warriors and gold coast havent done it, equal with cows, tigers and dragons, are we tossing their history too?