If they join with an east’s tigers bid the nrl keep it lol
So this dickhead wants a Perth side that plays game in North Sydney, a PNG side that plays games in Cairns, and now a Brisbane side that plays games at Leichhardt.
If they join with an east’s tigers bid the nrl keep it lol
First boss of the indep arlc was from qldI think you're right about the QRL not allowing the Dolphins to use the same name.
You cannot deny that the game's administration is Sydney-centric?
If it wasn't then the Chairman wouldn't be trying to revive a dead Sydney club and force it on a market that doesn't want nor need it.
There's no reason for a Perth-based club to be tied with the Bears. It's just a narrowminded ploy by a corrupt and delusional Sydney-centric administration to make everything about Sydney. If you cannot understand why people outside of Sydney object to this then maybe you should ask your GP for a referral to a psychiatrist.
V'Landys is looking to find ways to reconcile two very "at odds" groups within the RL community - the expansionists and the traditionalists - and I think he's managing to do a bit of bothFirst boss of the indep arlc was from qld
exactly because they didn’t want to be perceived to be Sydney centric
heck even a former qld premier became boss as well. Shame he didn’t know the Cronulla sharks were an nrl side
Isn’t pvl Brisbane centric by adding a small qrl side to the nrl ?
Good lord. That’s too logicalV'Landys is looking to find ways to reconcile two very "at odds" groups within the RL community - the expansionists and the traditionalists - and I think he's managing to do a bit of both
Publicly declaring that 20 teams is the target is expansionist thinking - especially since Perth & NZ 2 are well in the mix & the concept of PNG refuses to lapse.. on the other hand, having investment in suburban venues, getting the Bears back, and practically promoting Redcliffe appeal to traditionalists.
He realizes he has to bring both sides with him, and each side may have to swallow the odd "dead rat" to get a compromise between the two sides - so be it.
The alternatives are pissing-off half the game's community by being too radical OR doing little-to-nothing and being left for dead by other sports.
why are you so far up his ass? it's a little weird, if not suss...He will deliver
18. Perth bears
2. Png
3. Christchurch
nrl footprint 45 million ppl
You have to look it this kinda through a politics lens.Good lord. That’s too logical
There isn’t two sidesV'Landys is looking to find ways to reconcile two very "at odds" groups within the RL community - the expansionists and the traditionalists - and I think he's managing to do a bit of both
Publicly declaring that 20 teams is the target is expansionist thinking - especially since Perth & NZ 2 are well in the mix & the concept of PNG refuses to lapse.. on the other hand, having investment in suburban venues, getting the Bears back, and practically promoting Redcliffe appeal to traditionalists.
He realizes he has to bring both sides with him, and each side may have to swallow the odd "dead rat" to get a compromise between the two sides - so be it.
This is the community we have in out sport. The superleague war (and its fallout) exacerbated that, and it's never been addressed properly until now.
The alternatives are pissing-off half the game's community by being too radical OR doing little-to-nothing and being left for dead by other sports.
‘Detente’ is a good descriptionYou have to look it this kinda through a politics lens.
He's trying to build a "grand coalition" between the conservatives & the expansionists.
Coalition building requires compromises on both sides.
Because i want to see rugby league reach its potential and place as the number one sport in Australia princesswhy are you so far up his ass? it's a little weird, if not suss...
The politics he has to sort out is getting the 17 clubs plus nswrl and qrl ro agree to expansionYou have to look it this kinda through a politics lens.
He's trying to build a "grand coalition" between the conservatives & the expansionists.
Coalition building requires compromises on both sides.
better than living in denial, and objecting to every move he makes, it's a good thing to strive for better especially since he doesn't really have to, he could easily sit on his nsw racing throne, and watch us wither like RU or A-league into insignificewhy are you so far up his ass? it's a little weird, if not suss...
He isn't doing that, he is just getting them onside for his own purposes, there's no grand scheme in solidifying a RL fan base, just gotta not ruffle the important votesYou have to look it this kinda through a politics lens.
He's trying to build a "grand coalition" between the conservatives & the expansionists.
Coalition building requires compromises on both sides.
Shame there hasn't been a chair for some time with balls to get shit doneV'landys is doing his job.
Mergers are comprises. I'm with the dolphins CEO, Perth Bears are a disaster waiting to happen.You have to look it this kinda through a politics lens.
He's trying to build a "grand coalition" between the conservatives & the expansionists.
Coalition building requires compromises on both sides.
Perth Bears wouldn't be a merger but a relocation. Same way the Sydney Swans are relocated South Melbourne, but the Brisbane Lions are the result of a Fitzroy/ Brisbane Bears merger.Mergers are comprises. I'm with the dolphins CEO, Perth Bears are a disaster waiting to happen.
No it's not.Perth Bears wouldn't be a merger but a relocation. Same way the Sydney Swans are relocated South Melbourne, but the Brisbane Lions are the result of a Fitzroy/ Brisbane Bears merger.
At least the Perth Bears won't split their home games in the mad way that Wests Tigers are, trying to appease fans who prefer Leichardt, those who prefer Campbelltown AND those drawn to the modern facilities at Parramatta (including corporates).Look at WB. he was a balmain fan but now doesn't follow the merger. They alienate fans.