Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
I can only go on what I've heard on here. You're the first Western Australian on here to speak favourably about the proposal. At least from the posts I've read.
The Bears didn't do themselves any favours by making that demand.
And there you go again. Pathways = Sydney identity and that’s your agenda. Just give up pretending. I’ve said all along , and you ignore, it a Perth side will have feeder arrangements just like every other club. What they dont want and should not have is a dead Sydney clubs moniker, a home game in Sydney and board members and influence from clubs like the bears..
Tik tok huh? Lol
League fans on reddit didn’t know what the super league war was
Tik tok says hello
That was almost 30 years ago. An entire generation or two have been born since then.
You have your ear out in perf do you? All your posts are so transparent it's not funny, this has been a sydney centric myopia issue ever since, Perth became favourites to win a licence, now with the bears it's foregone conclusion that theyll acquire it, at the cost of one measly game away from Perth, ever club takes games away from their home ground, Bathurst, Tamworth, Gladstone, Darwin, Hamilton etc, there is zero issue here, other than your distaste for any bid that isn't east tigers
Like your mate trump that’s the demographic you are using in your polls
Asking for responses is NOT a scientific basis for guaging opinions - those who object are gonna skew the sample.
