What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

18th club, whose next?

MugaB

Coach
Messages
15,042
It was never a good idea to have the Western Corridor represented by “Easts”.
Wel they are technically not easts anymore, their current branding is "brisbane" tigers, still being 50min drive away from Ipswich (where the possible bid would be based) doesn't help
 

Matt_CBY

Juniors
Messages
1,519
Given the talk around Perth it's likely that they're looking to move expansion in-house, which could be a good move in theory except for the fact that making the Bears involvement a non-negotiable prerequisite for a side in Perth makes the NRL's actual intentions as clear as day.
I was going to say “please enlighten us” but then went back to see who the poster was. never mind, you know shit f**k all and your opinions are even worse.

Long live PVL.
 

Matt_CBY

Juniors
Messages
1,519
I don't think it has anything to do with their bid, more to do with their location, had the firehawks/east tigers picked up and went to Christchurch or Adelaide for example, I would think that the NRL and its clubs would've pounced on the idea, we all know they wouldn't have put zero in their bid documents
You might think that, we don’t know that.

What we do know is the bids have been rejected.
 

Matt_CBY

Juniors
Messages
1,519
Wel they are technically not easts anymore, their current branding is "brisbane" tigers, still being 50min drive away from Ipswich (where the possible bid would be based) doesn't help
Just like the Roosters. They will be forever Easts to me.
 

Trifili13

Juniors
Messages
1,125
If the NRL does end up running its own team, will the clubs still demand a licence fee? Or will they be promised a share of profits if the club ever gets sold?

So far we have:
- no bids that meet whatever criteria the ARLC has set for admission
- the ARLC coming out and saying we basically don't want private ownership so most bids have wasted their time and money
- Brisbane bids also wasted their time and money
- PNG is the only 'bid' that makes the cut after the ARLC negotiated a licence fee with the Australian Government using taxpayers money. No govt money, no PNG team. Looks like its built on solid foundations from day 1.

Sounds like a successful expansion bid process so far and should be used as a study case by Harvard and other leading business schools around the world.
 

Red&BlackBear

First Grade
Messages
5,425
If north sydney can represent Perth then I don't see the problem with easts tigers in the Western corridor.
2 very different scenarios. One is because there’s no genuine set up of pathways to a level of satisfactory requirement and would attract minimal away fan base and the other is basically like Roosters representing Penrith..
 

Bukowski

Bench
Messages
2,659
If the NRL does end up running its own team, will the clubs still demand a licence fee? Or will they be promised a share of profits if the club ever gets sold?

So far we have:
- no bids that meet whatever criteria the ARLC has set for admission
- the ARLC coming out and saying we basically don't want private ownership so most bids have wasted their time and money
- Brisbane bids also wasted their time and money
- PNG is the only 'bid' that makes the cut after the ARLC negotiated a licence fee with the Australian Government using taxpayers money. No govt money, no PNG team. Looks like its built on solid foundations from day 1.

Sounds like a successful expansion bid process so far and should be used as a study case by Harvard and other leading business schools around the world.
All credit to them for 'apparently' wanting expansion but they get an F for execution.
 

Matt_CBY

Juniors
Messages
1,519
If the NRL does end up running its own team, will the clubs still demand a licence fee? Or will they be promised a share of profits if the club ever gets sold?

So far we have:
- no bids that meet whatever criteria the ARLC has set for admission
- the ARLC coming out and saying we basically don't want private ownership so most bids have wasted their time and money
- Brisbane bids also wasted their time and money
- PNG is the only 'bid' that makes the cut after the ARLC negotiated a licence fee with the Australian Government using taxpayers money. No govt money, no PNG team. Looks like its built on solid foundations from day 1.

Sounds like a successful expansion bid process so far and should be used as a study case by Harvard and other leading business schools around the world.
Love this blow up.

could only pretend to be that upper-class poster for so long aye.
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
33,650
Pvl actions lately are a bit weird and a blow to the expansion process

Is he trying to placate clubs who don’t want such a fast expansion ? Is he trying to get more money out of bids ?

His approach is a bit puzzling when this could be handled behind closed doors

The recent article is kind of an own goal
 

Latest posts

Top