Is it just me, or if Boults’s playing are we likely in front?
Didn't he choose not to play tour incessantly with the black caps to spend more time with his family? And then pops up in every overseas t20 comp?Is it just me, or if Boults’s playing are we likely in front?
He did, but he’s available at times and is in the country and both Henry and Jamieson are out…. It’s a no brainer, these guys make Mick Lewis look goodDidn't he choose not to play tour incessantly with the black caps to spend more time with his family? And then pops up in every overseas t20 comp?
Fine player but you're either in or you're not in. Is he going to Pakistan mid year, or is he spending time with family?
Didn't he choose not to play tour incessantly with the black caps to spend more time with his family? And then pops up in every overseas t20 comp?
Fine player but you're either in or you're not in. Is he going to Pakistan mid year, or is he spending time with family?
Disagree with you here. How can you develop players if you're picking Trent when he decides to be available? The other sod has to do the leg work in Pakistan yet gets dropped from the team because Trent has a VIP pass to whatever game doesn't clash with his t20 contracts or sister in laws gender reveal.tbf, Jumping into a couple of t20 leagues (of his choosing) for 3-4 weeks is very different to being contracted and told to go away for months of the year
He is 34yo this year and every right to do what he has done.
However he is still available for selection at home. Nothing wrong picking your best 11contracted or not IMO, especially when you have injuries and poor depth
Disagree with you here. How can you develop players if you're picking Trent when he decides to be available? The other sod has to do the leg work in Pakistan yet gets dropped from the team because Trent has a VIP pass to whatever game doesn't clash with his t20 contracts or sister in laws gender reveal.
Good decision by the team to leave him out, short term pain, long-term stability.
also, I think, a key issue here is how little our guys get paid playing for NZ relative to Aust/Eng/India - little we can do about that, not sure why NZ cricket can't be more flexible, pick the 11 best available, a similar approach cost us the best years of Glenn Turnertbf, Jumping into a couple of t20 leagues (of his choosing) for 3-4 weeks is very different to being contracted and told to go away for months of the year
He is 34yo this year and every right to do what he has done.
However he is still available for selection at home. Nothing wrong picking your best 11contracted or not IMO, especially when you have injuries and poor depth
Kuggeleijn is 31 with a first class average of 32, and Tickner 29 with a first class average of 35... there's no development angle here, they are journeymen plodders... if there was some development or long term stability here, I’d be ok with it….Disagree with you here. How can you develop players if you're picking Trent when he decides to be available? The other sod has to do the leg work in Pakistan yet gets dropped from the team because Trent has a VIP pass to whatever game doesn't clash with his t20 contracts or sister in laws gender reveal.
Good decision by the team to leave him out, short term pain, long-term stability.
But they've committed themselves to playing for New Zealand. Boult has indicated he only wants to play for New Zealand on his terms.Kuggeleijn is 31 with a first class average of 32, and Tickner 29 with a first class average of 35... there's no development angle here, they are journeymen plodders... if there was some development or long term stability here, I’d be ok with it….