The Mad Hatter
Coach
- Messages
- 14,839
I'm surprised Starc wasn't dropped for this test for Maxderp.
Starc is actually a better test batsman than Mitch Marsh.
f**k he can bat
The crime is, Starc has had to smash out a 50, then will be expected to bowl 170km/hr and take 11 wickets an innings.
If you are replying to me what does RL have anything to do with the fact you are absolutely clueless when it comes to the game of cricket???Why so salty? It was only a trial.
You speak far too much Sense to post in here.How on earth can anyone justify having Mitchell Marsh bat at 6 for Australia? Spin friendly pitch and the guy clearly isn't up for batting at 6. Would have had Maxwell or Agar there well before Marsh.
All hail Matt Renshaw, a cricketer who actually has a set. He has been so impressive ever since his debut.
Matthew Wade. No comment.
Starcy for MOM. Big all round performance comming up from him.
Our selectors have this obsession with picking an all-rounder, can't we just call Starc an all-rounder and be done with it.Starc just showing how useless our top order are.
Don't give them ideas. Horses for courses and all that.I'm surprised Starc wasn't dropped for this test for Maxderp.
Honestly us blokes in here could pick a better side after a week on the piss listening to the likes of Locky and Frog.Renshaw showed his toughness when he stayed on in the test where he went on to make 184
Our selectors have this obsession with picking an all-rounder, can't we just call Starc an all-rounder and be done with it.
Thank god for Starc and Renshaw, and Haze for hanging in. He's already faced more balls than levers. Why oh why did our selectors think it a brilliant idea to pick the worlds longest tail against India?
You are no longer welcome Victoriania.....Next you will say Wade is better than Nevill, VFL will kill it in China...............Starc is legit a better batsman than M Marsh or Wade.
No hyperbole.