ANTiLAG
First Grade
- Messages
- 8,014
I said he's in the debate - that's all - like many of our earlier cricketers (albeit for different reasons) his test career was limited (Donnelly, Dempster, Cowie) or in Grimmett's case not for NZ... So I think we need to look at the #1 ranking, the 100 first class centuries, and actually just have a look at him bat, plus regardless of who the bowlers were he scored runs in events that were very important to us - there is not a doubt in my mind he was a great batsman, it's a great shame he didn't continue his test career because then this wouldn't be a discussion - like Crowe he was technically correct, like Williamson insatiable for runs - he ends at #3 for me (with Donnelly), but I prefer the idea that there is a group, none of them are head and shoulders above the rest (as I said this is the case in most countries), and Williamson is the one that will be able to separate himself satistically through weight of runs and centuries, like Hadlee has done... I guess I like to weight people from the previous generations more highly, Cowie for me is likely the second best pace bowler, and his record is incredible but a short career
I'd be surprised if Turner even has let alone clearly a better first class record than Crowe whose career was cut short by injury, but seeing you rank Turner 3, I won't continue the argument. I'll note that even analysing Turner's impressive career odi record, it just doesn't look as good when scrutinising the scorecards of his successes, be it simply weak opposition bowling, or playing Asian teams with good spinners outside of Asia leaving their spin threat largely nullified.
I have no issue with people merely grouping KW and Crowe together until if and when KW just has such sheer weight of runs at a higher average as to usurp Crowe. But I don't think Turner belongs in this group based on his own red ball career.
And I understand your point regards the best bowler after Hadlee. You prefer Cowie, I prefer Bond, but their careers are much shorter than what we hope for Boult or even Wagner who will not, barring an extroardinary change in cricket performances, ever compete with Cowie or Bond's average.
Last edited: