salivor said:Oh god the irony.
[furrycat] said:Touchy touchy.
The thread is about the Top 10 and without any provacation you and your little friend start bringing in past arguments and trying to bait Aussie posters. Really, it's pathetic :lol:
salivor said:Yep you just remember your little words of wisdom next time you're regularly derailing threads with squabbles.
MKEB... said:But the question is, would he have made it into the Aussie side to start with. Look how many other great players really could not make it into the aussie side.
The Mack said:Flintoff's bowling average in the ODI arena is excellent, around 25, with an economy below 4.4. And if you look at his Test career since the 2003/2004 test series against Sri Lanka, when he actually began bowling as a strike man, he has averaged around 24-26 with the ball since then, only recently peaking above 27 due to a poor Ashes series.
griffo346 said:They Should take the top half of the batting and top half of the bowling and make a ICC XI and play us
HevyDevy said:They tried that - it didn't work
Don't get me wrong, I rate Kallis as a great player but I'd never pick him over Clarke or Symonds....
salivor said:He doesn't go too bad in ODI's with an average of 44 but I guess his strike rate only being in the 70's would see him find it tough for a spot in that Australian side.
HevyDevy said:Hey, don't like it eh?
However, I'm trying to find one that doesn't.
Let's see - JJ, Ozbash, Manu, yourself, Beaver - I was right!