Big, big difference between the two clubs, unfortunately.
The Bulldogs are seen as a proud and successful entity; a bad year for them is nothing as they will bounce back.
Parramatta has been seen as by many now as a joke; even when we have a successful season we screw up; take 2005 - Minor Premiers and on paper we SHOULD have dusted the Cowboys. We choked massively. In 2007 we didn't choke but our season, overall, was a joke. Yeah, we finished 6th and 1 game shy of a Grand Final. But we lost to teams we should have beaten, barely scraped home in matches where we looked good for large portions and basically were an inconsistent mess.
Rightly or wrongly, I believe that our club's image has suffered a battering over the past few years due to both incompetent on-field showings and off-field dramas.
The Bulldogs have their share of off-field and even on-field crap, true. But you can't deny their success - they cheated the cap in 2002 and got caught, but 24 short months later won a title. They had a miserable 2008, but given the circumstances it's understandable.
The Bulldogs recruited very well for 2009 and beyond, and I bet most of that was on the back of the club's proud history of success. They needed new stars to move forward and signed: Eastwood, Stagg, Ennis, Kimmorley and Morris, to name but a few.
I fear that, in a somewhat similar situation, we won't be able to make a similar impact simply because we've become a laughing stock. The last huge signings we made were Tahu, Morrison and Pig, and they were all when Brian was at the helm and we weren't in that bad a mess. Since then we've screwed up finances, our CEO has managed to alienate just about everyone, boardroom dramas have escalated and off-field issues have tainted this once proud club.
Again - I, like all of the people here, bleed Blue and Gold. But I have to face reality - in terms of professionalism and on-field success, we've become a joke. I mean this with all due respect, but would Melbourne, Manly, Brisbane or the Roosters, for example, offer Krisnan Inu, Jarryd Hayne or Nathan Cayless such exorbitant amounts of money given what they have produced thus far? I would lean towards 'no'.
Unless we offer a player $400,000, which won't happen under Anderson unless it's a Lockyer, a Thurston or an Asotasi (and rightfully so, in my eyes), I can't see the appeal from a player's perspective to joining this circus.