WHY???the code really needs the Raiders to win.
This would be a penalty usually for a crusher tackle
Thanks you summed up this whole thread
Is it night of the geniuss or something?
It was a fair try FFS.
Its been a disgrace actually, bunker on the storm no try the worst example, kick and crusher not called and a strip called a knock on
Edit RE: The Shield
It would be OK if Cronulla won.I couldn't stomach watching a storm v sharks GF so Raiders, you've gotta win.
You are having a cry over nothing mate. If you think the raiders did anything worth penalising defending their try line in that play you dont know what you are talking about. Maybe the knock on call was harsh but what do you propose the raiders just let the storm score ?
Then you guys should get all the callsLOL. And the NRL are controlled by little green men.
what do you expect ashly klown in the bunker..Its been a disgrace actually, bunker on the storm no try the worst example, kick and crusher not called and a strip called a knock on
Edit RE: The Shield
If they didn't have Gallen, Fifita and Flanno, so would I.It would be OK if Cronulla won.
Last few weeks have shown that to lash out in a kicking action toward an opposing player is against the rules.....even if it does go unnoticed sometimes
Wouldn't it be Cheatbowl II possibly III? 2012 was Dogs v Storm and if you want to count Parra v Storm in 2009 there would be the other.Cheatbowl I.
Salary cap cheats vs. Drug cheats.
Bullshit.Watch the game with both eyes and you will Storm getting worked over in tackles by the grubby faders.put your bais against Storm and watch the game
Im not even sure when tapine apparently kicked the ball out ? The video ref looked for it and sent it back as no try.
Yes, you are right.Wouldn't it be Cheatbowl II possibly III? 2012 was Dogs v Storm and if you want to count Parra v Storm in 2009 there would be the other.