Danish
Referee
- Messages
- 32,019
Replaced by Mcguire.
Maguire isn't fit to clean Myles' hallway
Replaced by Mcguire.
Yep. It was the 31st minute when Pearce kicked to Gagai's breadbasket. Instead of building pressure, he relieved it, and gifted Qld a 7 tackle set. They scored a few minutes later.No it isn't. Going for repeat sets is building pressure and fatiguing the opposition in order to crack the opposing team and increase try scoring options.
I'm sure everyone was happy with not getting the repeat set on Pearce's first grubber and his stab in goal to Gagai on the full.
NSW dominated field position and didn't get a repeat set for the whole first half.
Outside of his kicking game, Pearce did a good job. If he stays, which he will, I think the strategy around who kicks when needs to be reviewed.
Pearce is a more talented kicker than Maloney in every situation. Pearce f**ked two attacking kicks up, everything else was very good. Being able to land a high ball in the corner within the last 10m without ever going ingoal or out is not a common skill. If Maloney was better than him at it, he'd have the job.Outside of his kicking game, good job. If he stays, which he will, I think the strategy around who kicks when needs to be reviewed.
I thought I detected a strategy from NSW - running it on the last. I suspect the short kicking deficiencies was a key reason for that. It's not a terrible ideaPearce is a more talented kicker than Maloney in every situation. Pearce f**ked two attacking kicks up, everything else was very good. Being able to land a high ball in the corner within the last 10m without ever going ingoal or out is not a common skill. If Maloney was better than him at it, he'd have the job.
Oates is the most overrated player in the NRL.
On another note: one thing you can say about Queensland - they won't shitbag their team after a big win.
If NSW had a half who could kick well, we would have got 50 put on us, no doubt about it
So what does the rap sheet look like for this one? I reckon:
David Klemmer - grade 2 careless high tackle, 1 week
Blake Ferguson - 2 x grade 1 careless high tackle, 1 week
Boyd Cordner - grade 4 contrary conduct, 8 weeks
Jarryd Hayne - grade 2 head slam, 3 weeks
Andrew Fifita - grade 2 reckless high tackle, 4 weeks
Josh McGuire - grade 2 striking, grade 1 dangerous throw, grade 2 careless high tackle, 6 weeks
Will Chambers - grade 2 shoulder charge, 4 weeks
I do love Duges... but imagine if NSW had picked James Roberts or Dylan Walker at right centre!Just give it early to Cordner/Friz/Hayne/Graham (Not Dugan).
Maroons missed strike power in the middle without Slater sniffing around, Smith and Cronk nearly pulled off a try but not having the Smith/Cronk/Slater combo is madness, should easily be worth a couple of tries.
If Cronk was playing for NSW it would have been 20+ to nil instea of 6-4 just before half time.
Sugar coat it any way you want but if NSW dont score right on HT they go into the sheds knowing they dominated but had f**k all to show for it. From there the outcome could have been very different.
A lot of that dominance was stymied by Pearces poor 5th tackle options. We won and he will be rightly selected for the next game. But far from convinced he has the game to be successful in this arena long term.
Agreed. It is a deplorable tactic, worse than the kick dead tactic that lead to the 7 tackle rule. At least that kick dead tactic you have to find space.
Smith won't get sighted for this but anyways..
it's funny how much criticism cronk has avoided because of his reputation, his kicking game was diabolical not counting the crossfield oates try. it was one of his most ordinary games i've seen and the reality is pearce outplayed him
Gee, let me think about that for a second. Oh, maybe it is because Cronk has had one off night in 20 origin games with a badly beaten fwd pack in front of him whilst Pearce has had one passable (not great or good even) game in 16 appearances behind a rampant pack? His other 15 have been diabolical.
Qld had one chance in the 1st half and Cronk put the ball on a dime for Oates to score.
What is it with all the Mitch apologists?
i'm not an apologist, have a look at my ratings thread, i had him down for a 6. not great but not awful. like fox i think summarised not enough to vindicate or disprove his doubters. my point is get a grip of yourself.