What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2017 R10 - Sea Eagles 14-24 Broncos @ Suncorp

Round 10: Sea Eagles v Broncos


  • Total voters
    14
  • Poll closed .

wibble

Bench
Messages
4,661
I've never understood why that's not a penalty. It's another ridiculous rule, he was every bit as high as he would be contesting a bomb.

It's because the rule was never, ever about player safety, as the NRL claims. If it was, attacking players would get the same protection, as would players after a bounce.

It was clearly only introduced to make defending bombs easier, to deter "boring" football.
 

Hutty1986

Immortal
Messages
34,034
Broncs will be bloody hard to stop now. Seagles needed at least one try from all that possession about ten minutes ago.

Edit-and they score
 

Bazal

Post Whore
Messages
103,883
It's because the rule was never, ever about player safety, as the NRL claims. If it was, attacking players would get the same protection, as would players after a bounce.

It was clearly only introduced to make defending bombs easier, to deter "boring" football.

Pretty much spot on....
 

Latest posts

Top