What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2017 R7 Sat - Raiders 20-8 Warriors @ GIO

Round 7: Raiders v Warriors


  • Total voters
    14
  • Poll closed .

wibble

Bench
Messages
4,661
Wow! That tackle from Croker.

I know it was 3 minutes ago, I just realised I'm watching it on IQ 3 minutes delayed...

I wondered why everyone was praising Croker 3 minutes ago for a regulation tackle...
 

Leber

Bench
Messages
3,959
Those missed chances will really hurt. I dont think a 2 point lead is enough when the raiders will surely come back.

Still, even if we lose this, shows that we can be competitive against a top side.
 

KeepingTheFaith

Referee
Messages
25,235
The first half last year at this ground was almost identical with the Warriors dominating but not converting.

I suppose the positive is that last year the Raiders scored twice in the last 5 to take the lead at half time.

Anyone's game, but I can't help feeling that if the Raiders get the same amount of possession they'll get home.
 

ZEROMISSTACKLES

First Grade
Messages
8,700
Blocker needs to shut da f**k up. Warriors looking to score twice and all he can praise is Raiders cover defence. What about our attack?
 

wibble

Bench
Messages
4,661
Those missed chances will really hurt. I dont think a 2 point lead is enough when the raiders will surely come back.

Still, even if we lose this, shows that we can be competitive against a top side.

Warriors are nothing like the team I've grown used to watching. They are ... solid.

They've never been that. Surely it can't just be Foran? Good game management helps, but they are doing a lot more of those extra 1% plays across the board.

Raiders still look incredibly dangerous out wide. Game is well and truly on.
 

ZEROMISSTACKLES

First Grade
Messages
8,700
Wow! That tackle from Croker.

I know it was 3 minutes ago, I just realised I'm watching it on IQ 3 minutes delayed...

I wondered why everyone was praising Croker 3 minutes ago for a regulation tackle...
The set play to put RTS was far more impressive. What Croker done WAS a regulation tackle, the captain had to cover his teams defensive woe. It wasnt a big hit, it was a tackle you'll see a couple of times a year to be honest.
 

nick87

Coach
Messages
12,455
The warriors playing all over us. Probably helps that they spent most the half standing 2m offside haha
We should be down 14, not 2
 

wibble

Bench
Messages
4,661
The set play to put RTS was far more impressive. What Croker done WAS a regulation tackle, the captain had to cover his teams defensive woe. It wasnt a big hit, it was a tackle you'll see a couple of times a year to be honest.

It was a lovely play from the Warriors, again quite unWarrior like, very solid.

Players may be "expected" to make 1 on 1 cover tackles (well, 2 on 1 but he wrapped it up after Wighton fell off) but in reality, against a charging RTS, plenty of times he would score that.

Great play from both teams, like most this half.
 

ZEROMISSTACKLES

First Grade
Messages
8,700
The warriors playing all over us. Probably helps that they spent most the half standing 2m offside haha
We should be down 14, not 2
If we were offside the reffs will pin us. They watch us more closely than the Raiders. So far I think all our tries have gone to the TMO and fair enough on those two calls. When Papalii cries offside, reffs wait a sec and then give it. When Johnson gets clearly held back, reffs dont give it. Dont worry about the offside the NZ reffs (or are they aussie refs?) are watching it.
 

Meapro Ham

Juniors
Messages
1,813
Good game. One of the best this year actually. I think warriors are an underrated side. On paper their spine is as good as anyone's.
 

Latest posts

Top