Melbourne have hosted prelims at AAMI numerous times and there's never been talk of locking 10,000 fans out. There was talk of moving it in 2015 but apparently Melbourne were contractually obliged to play at AAMI. That year was also their highest crowd, the last two years have been lower. If there was the possibility of locking out 25,000 supporters like there is with a possible Souths-Roosters prelim, then yeah it would be the same logic.
There's no point talking about moving a Storm prelim to Etihad on the suspicion that it might get a bigger crowd, but when thousands of people are definitely going to be locked out of an all-Sydney prelim, absolutely it's worth talking about moving it.
25,000? For about the 10th time in this thread, the 2014 prelim got 50k
The souths/dragons game is looking like getting between 40 and 50k which is exactly what the prelim at SFS will get.
IMO, the minor premier and week 1 winner (i.e., easts) should always get the friday night. what is happening in the AFL is moot.
the schedule was f**ked by both the wallabies match on saturday and the NRL rd 25 schedule. the 2,3,6,7 group should have their matches first in week 1 so the above can happen and there is no need for crossover.
ideally week 1 should've gone.
Fri - MEL vs SS
Sat - BRI vs SGI (broncos woul've been considered disadvantaged though due to playing on sunday rd 25)
Sat - SYD vs CRO
Sun - PEN vs NZW
then week 2
Fri - SS vs SGI
Sat - CRO vs PEN
then week 3
Fri - SYD vs SS/SGI
Sat - MEL vs CRO/PEN
apart from the winner of 6 vs 7, and 5 vs 8 getting 6-day breaks going into week 2 (they finished 5th to 8th anyway), the schedule then allows for at least 7 day breaks into the prelim and GF. all the advantages should be scheduled to accommodate the minor premier as week 1 winner.
Yes but your scenario for Week 1 was never going to happen as Suncorp Stadium was not available on Saturday due to the Wallabies playing there. Hence all the rest of it is moot.
Actually, 52,592, which is about 8,000 more than Allianz can hold.For about the 10th time in this thread, the 2014 prelim got 50k
Actually, 52,592, which is about 8,000 more than Allianz can hold.
Considering their stance on Week 1 at suburban stadiums, a tad hypocritical. Can't be upsetting The Big Chicken though.
Nothing to worry about this year, its much too late, but going forward a somewhat more flexible arrangement might prove amenable to all stakeholders.This is a different aituation to the suburban grounds. The NRL dont consider them suitable for any finals game. Whether me, you or anyone else agrees with that is irrelevant, everyone knows those grounds aren't to host finals.
In the case of the SFS the NRL has deemed it suitable for all finals apart from the GF and it is our choice to play there. Either we should be allowed or the venue should be deemed unsuitable for all week 3 games.
We're the only sport in the world that would even contemplate taking a well-won home ground advantage off a team so a few thousand extra people can get in. 99.9% of the people who watch the game will be doing so on TV.
The Roosters won the home ground advantage. If you want to go, have your browser open on the ticketek website the minute they go on sale.
That is precisely the position with week 1 finals at Cronulla, Brookvale or Penrith.We're the only sport in the world that would even contemplate taking a well-won home ground advantage off a team so a few thousand extra people can get in.
That is precisely the position with week 1 finals at Cronulla, Brookvale or Penrith.
That is precisely the position with week 1 finals at Cronulla, Brookvale or Penrith.
Which I by and large disagree with.
I think Week 1 finals should be home ground finals, as long as grounds meet minimum criteria - for example, 20,000 minimum capacity, a certain percentage of the ground seated, a certain percentage of the ground under cover for spectators, etc.
It wouldn't rule out Brookvale and co, but it would mean unless they receive modern amenities they have to move.
Weeks 2 and 3 should be the best stadium in the home city (with the exception of Sydney, were the home club should get a choice between Allianz, WSS or ANZ) - and I mean all cities.
As it stands, I think one of the greatest injustices in the system is that Canberra and Newcastle's 'home' city for week 3 would be Sydney, and the Gold Coast's is Brisbane.
Can you imagine if the Roosters and the Knights ran 1 and 2. The Roosters drop their first game, the Knights win. The Roosters win their week 2 game. That would mean the prelim is Newcastle vs Easts at Allianz with the Knights as the home team? It's utter nonsense, and not good for the game at all.
25,000? For about the 10th time in this thread, the 2014 prelim got 50k
The souths/dragons game is looking like getting between 40 and 50k which is exactly what the prelim at SFS will get.
This is a different aituation to the suburban grounds. The NRL dont consider them suitable for any finals game. Whether me, you or anyone else agrees with that is irrelevant, everyone knows those grounds aren't to host finals.
In the case of the SFS the NRL has deemed it suitable for all finals apart from the GF and it is our choice to play there. Either we should be allowed or the venue should be deemed unsuitable for all week 3 games.
SFS can only hold 35K in a sellout
The rest are only SCG/SFS members if they chose to attend
You will easily get 50k plus for preliminary final of two Sydney teams
This is exactly the sort of game that should be at Homebush
We should be promoting this game so that to 60-70k attend