What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2018 NRL TV Ratings

Cumberland Throw

First Grade
Messages
6,553
You can look across all the simulcast games, they rate just as highly as the exclusive games. It's clear that games being shown on 9 has no impact on their ratings on fox.

It's more reason why Friday 6pm is a silly timeslot and also shows there is no reason why we can't have a regular game on a Saturday (it won't affect super Saturday).



Those ratings for the international matches in 1993 are depressing as f**k. They weren't far off SOO and 1 game out rated the AFL grand final.

It pisses me off to constantly hear how there is no interest in international league. There's interest, but we've done everything we can to squander it.

Based on these results.. the nrl could simulcast every game on fta and fox
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
70,193
Based on these results.. the nrl could simulcast every game on fta and fox

Except crowds would take even more of a hit!
What it does possibly show is that NRL could broadcast its own games on digital without impacting too much on Fox? Not sure what the $100mill digital spend is going on but surely it must be getting ready for self production and direct to customer content sale?

In ten years could we see NRL on digital and Fox only, no more FTA?
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
70,193
In ten years there might not be any FTA TV fullstop.

Doubt it. It might be streamed but there will still be FTA paid for by advertising. Think Ch9 ended up paying about $650mill to NRL this term. If NRL could sell enough digital subscriptions plus online advertising to cover $130mill a year is questionable. How may likely subscribers for a NRL digital channel do you think there would be in years to come?
 

gUt

Coach
Messages
16,935
None because the AFL do it so much better and by then NRL will be a distant memory and we'll all be racist skeletal drug addicted mongoloids cheering for a Melbourne suburb
 

tri_colours

Juniors
Messages
1,947
NRL set to smash revenue forecast and post $50m-plus surplus


ByJohn Stensholt,


12:00AM September 3, 2018


The National Rugby League is set to smash revenue and profit forecasts and post a huge surplus of more than $50 million in 2018, fuelled by its massive broadcast deal and better-than-expected commercial income.

Rugby league crowds and television ratings have plateaued, but half of the 16 clubs in the competition will at least break even, led by the most financially successful outfit in the competition, the Brisbane Broncos, and the resurgent South Sydney Rabbitohs.

The ASX-listed Broncos should make a full-year profit of more than $3 million while Souths, who finished third on the ladder after the weekend’s action, are on target to make a $1.3m net profit for their owners Russell Crowe and James Packer.

The Broncos were the only profitable club in 2017.

The NRL meanwhile is set to make a record surplus of at least $50m-$55m, a result that could be even higher if popular clubs such as Souths or St George Illawarra win through to the grand final.

The governing body’s revenue should top $530m, a big increase on the $354m result in 2017, though it still is behind the $650m the AFL received last year. Two AFL clubs alone this year, Richmond and West Coast, should make $10m combined.

There are also NRL clubs such as Cronulla, on track to lose $4m despite a finals appearance, that will struggle financially, while others with leagues club funding such as Canterbury, Penrith and Parramatta will have large fiscal losses covered.

But this year’s result will also exceed the NRL’s previous record surplus of $45.3m in 2013 and the AFL’s $48 million surplus in 2017. It also means the game has achieved a big turnaround in its financial position that at one stage last year had it considering taking out a loan before the TV money kicked in. “We will beat expectations and exceed our budget,” NRL chief executive Todd Greenberg told The Australian. “Our non-broadcast income has been strong for us and we’ve had double-digit growth across all categories in that space, which shows we have a strong executive team.”

The NRL claim television ratings have risen about 1.1 per cent and crowds have increased almost 3 per cent, boosted by big attendances in Auckland, Newcastle and the Gold Coast on the weekend.

Both the NRL and its clubs have been boosted by the first year of the code’s record $2 billion broadcast deal with Foxtel and Nine Entertainment Co, which has meant each club has received almost $13m in central grant funding. That in turn has led to eight clubs on the verge of breaking even.

As well as the Broncos and Souths, other clubs performing well financially are Melbourne, the Warriors, Gold Coast, North Queensland, Wests Tigers and Newcastle.

“It has been a very good year off the field for the code,” said NRL chief financial officer Tony Crawford. “The clubs are really showing an even greater level of professionalism and achieving some good financial results.”

Big membership increases have driven the good results for the likes of the Storm and Tigers, while the Titans have managed to renegotiate a cut of almost 50 per cent in the rent they pay at Cbus Super Stadium.

“It is hard to make money in rugby league but we made a conscious decision to concentrate on the business side four years ago,” Tigers president Marina Go said. “We’ve more than doubled our membership since then. But next year we must make the finals ”

The Storm’s financial strength have been underpinned by good crowds and licensed club revenue.

“We operate in the toughest market given we are the only NRL club in AFL heartland,” said Storm CEO Dave Donaghy. “But it has also given us a good opportunity to have a real point of difference. It should be pointed out too that the money we make off the field goes towards building what we are doing on it.”

Souths have had a big increase in crowd numbers as they surge back up the table, but CEO Blake Solly said commercial income has also been strong.

“We’ve got the Souths Cares foundation and while that is run separately it has a strong connection to the club, and we’ve found corporates really want to be associated with something like that.”


https://www.theaustralian.com.au/sp...s/news-story/fffb1c164c683069702f9f27baec674e
 
Last edited:

taipan

Referee
Messages
22,500
NRL set to smash revenue forecast and post $50m-plus surplus


ByJohn Stensholt,


12:00AM September 3, 2018


The National Rugby League is set to smash revenue and profit forecasts and post a huge surplus of more than $50 million in 2018, fuelled by its massive broadcast deal and better-than-expected commercial income.

Rugby league crowds and television ratings have plateaued, but half of the 16 clubs in the competition will at least break even, led by the most financially successful outfit in the competition, the Brisbane Broncos, and the resurgent South Sydney Rabbitohs.

The ASX-listed Broncos should make a full-year profit of more than $3 million while Souths, who finished third on the ladder after the weekend’s action, are on target to make a $1.3m net profit for their owners Russell Crowe and James Packer.

The Broncos were the only profitable club in 2017.

The NRL meanwhile is set to make a record surplus of at least $50m-$55m, a result that could be even higher if popular clubs such as Souths or St George Illawarra win through to the grand final.

The governing body’s revenue should top $530m, a big increase on the $354m result in 2017, though it still is behind the $650m the AFL received last year. Two AFL clubs alone this year, Richmond and West Coast, should make $10m combined.

There are also NRL clubs such as Cronulla, on track to lose $4m despite a finals appearance, that will struggle financially, while others with leagues club funding such as Canterbury, Penrith and Parramatta will have large fiscal losses covered.

But this year’s result will also exceed the NRL’s previous record surplus of $45.3m in 2013 and the AFL’s $48 million surplus in 2017. It also means the game has achieved a big turnaround in its financial position that at one stage last year had it considering taking out a loan before the TV money kicked in. “We will beat expectations and exceed our budget,” NRL chief executive Todd Greenberg told The Australian. “Our non-broadcast income has been strong for us and we’ve had double-digit growth across all categories in that space, which shows we have a strong executive team.”

The NRL claim television ratings have risen about 1.1 per cent and crowds have increased almost 3 per cent, boosted by big attendances in Auckland, Newcastle and the Gold Coast on the weekend.

Both the NRL and its clubs have been boosted by the first year of the code’s record $2 billion broadcast deal with Foxtel and Nine Entertainment Co, which has meant each club has received almost $13m in central grant funding. That in turn has led to eight clubs on the verge of breaking even.

As well as the Broncos and Souths, other clubs performing well financially are Melbourne, the Warriors, Gold Coast, North Queensland, Wests Tigers and Newcastle.

“It has been a very good year off the field for the code,” said NRL chief financial officer Tony Crawford. “The clubs are really showing an even greater level of professionalism and achieving some good financial results.”

Big membership increases have driven the good results for the likes of the Storm and Tigers, while the Titans have managed to renegotiate a cut of almost 50 per cent in the rent they pay at Cbus Super Stadium.

“It is hard to make money in rugby league but we made a conscious decision to concentrate on the business side four years ago,” Tigers president Marina Go said. “We’ve more than doubled our membership since then. But next year we must make the finals ”

The Storm’s financial strength have been underpinned by good crowds and licensed club revenue.

“We operate in the toughest market given we are the only NRL club in AFL heartland,” said Storm CEO Dave Donaghy. “But it has also given us a good opportunity to have a real point of difference. It should be pointed out too that the money we make off the field goes towards building what we are doing on it.”

Souths have had a big increase in crowd numbers as they surge back up the table, but CEO Blake Solly said commercial income has also been strong.

“We’ve got the Souths Cares foundation and while that is run separately it has a strong connection to the club, and we’ve found corporates really want to be associated with something like that.”


https://www.theaustralian.com.au/sp...s/news-story/fffb1c164c683069702f9f27baec674e


Thanks mate, saved me a hell of a lot of work spelling the whole spiel out.
 

taipan

Referee
Messages
22,500
Cronulla $4mill loss despite a $3mill bonus, SureLy not?

You APU, are a bit slow off the mark.
Cash flow problems have been brought up by the press earlier with the figure involved.Well before the Australian brought these figures up.
Development stages have been spelt out ,as to when any profits are to be shared between the club and developers.
But do have your brief moment in the sun, if that rocks your boat.
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
70,193
You APU, are a bit slow off the mark.
Cash flow problems have been brought up by the press earlier with the figure involved.Well before the Australian brought these figures up.
Development stages have been spelt out ,as to when any profits are to be shared between the club and developers.
But do have your brief moment in the sun, if that rocks your boat.

Seriously? That would mean on top of last years $4.6million loss posted this year in reality up to $7mill without the massive grant increase. Two $4million loss seasons back to back, best be hoping those apartments start selling soon. Id expected with the $3mill grant bonus and on the back of a successful season they would be coming in less than $2mill loss this year?
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
70,193
NRL set to smash revenue forecast and post $50m-plus surplus


ByJohn Stensholt,


12:00AM September 3, 2018


The National Rugby League is set to smash revenue and profit forecasts and post a huge surplus of more than $50 million in 2018, fuelled by its massive broadcast deal and better-than-expected commercial income.




https://www.theaustralian.com.au/sp...s/news-story/fffb1c164c683069702f9f27baec674e

NRL posted a $45mill profit first year of last deal in 2013. It seems the cycle of expenditure for codes.
I seem to remember a certain Sharks fan slagging Smith off for posting a profit and not spending everything, strange how he thinks Greenberg posting a profit is now a good thing lol.

Crowd growth is actually 1.5% not 3% (dodgy counting of double header me thinks by NRL)
 
Last edited:

taipan

Referee
Messages
22,500
Seriously? That would mean on top of last years $4.6million loss posted this year in reality up to $7mill without the massive grant increase. Two $4million loss seasons back to back, best be hoping those apartments start selling soon. Id expected with the $3mill grant bonus and on the back of a successful season they would be coming in less than $2mill loss this year?

I'm not going to continue to argue with you ,I've spelt out what is happening.The early stages were never going to be profit shared with the Sharks.That was spelt pout clearly for day one.The developers took all the risks
Think Pink Floyd has put too many bricks in the wall,for you to know what's happening.
The stage now being built right behind the Western stand is where money starts to flow.Has there been delays ,naturally.

Seeing as 80% + of the units have been purchased by locals, and houses and apartments like these have been selling quickly in the Shire.They have much better chance of selling, than the rather depressed Perth market, of which my brother -in-law took advantage to buy into.
 

taipan

Referee
Messages
22,500
NRL posted a $45mill profit first year of last deal in 2013. It seems the cycle of expenditure for codes.
I seem to remember a certain Sharks fan slagging Smith off for posting a profit and not spending everything, strange how he thinks Greenberg posting a profit is now a good thing lol.

Crowd growth is actually 1.5% not 3% (dodgy counting of double header me thinks by NRL)

That certain Shark's fan slagged Smith off for going rogue, for building a profit and neglecting the grassroots.That certain Shark's fan criticised Smith for putting the NRL in a position ,where Rupert decided to promote AFL in the Nthn States and News Ltd exec made the point we will be pushing that code with all our resources.Have a look at the Telegraph today ,which I reader free at Maccas.
Middle page spread in vivid colour of the Swans v GWS.

That certain Sharks fan bagged Smith,for employing some expensive consultants to do work,which I'm yet to find out exactly their results.

That certain Sharks fan thought Smith coming in from a business background ,would do wonders.He had little idea of how rugby league operates in this country and the factions within it.
That certain Shark's fan ,noted Mr Smith was quite happy to have lavish functions with the new found wealth, and the code was still marking time.

The double header ,if it were held again would not attract the same numbers in Perth.
I have little idea how the NRL worked out their averages,don't really care.

All that certain Sharks fan, cares about,is what the NRL plans to do with the $50m surplus,and that it is not wasted but used to grow the game, and improve infrastructure.

This coming from then same person over the Nullabor ,who earlier a couple of months ago, doubted the code would achieve $40m plus.
Who bagged everything the NRL did, now we get a profit,a test between the Roos and Tonga,double digit growth in other income, women's rl competition,money for having the G/F in Sydney for decades, new infrastructure in Sydney,and he's now bagging a certain Shark to deflect from these results.LOL.
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
NRL posted a $45mill profit first year of last deal in 2013. It seems the cycle of expenditure for codes.
I seem to remember a certain Sharks fan slagging Smith off for posting a profit and not spending everything, strange how he thinks Greenberg posting a profit is now a good thing lol.

Crowd growth is actually 1.5% not 3% (dodgy counting of double header me thinks by NRL)
you are a miserable f**k
 
  • Like
Reactions: gUt

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
70,193
.They have much better chance of selling, than the rather depressed Perth market, of which my brother -in-law took advantage to buy into.

Good idea, there's bound to be another boom at some point and there's some real bargains in the housing market here at the moment.

How much a year is it all set to bring in when fully sold and finsihed? More than $4mill a year?
 

mongoose

Coach
Messages
11,830
hmmm but according to various media reports the NRL was broke after they made a loss last year? :rolleyes::rolleyes:
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
70,193
That certain Shark's fan slagged Smith off for for building a profit and neglecting the grassroots..

haha but its ok for Greenberg to do exactly the same thing in running an even bigger surplus instead of spending it on the game?
Clearly the reality is the way the codes structure their expenditure they stockpile in year 1 and 2 to run deficits in subsequent years. Its ok you were wrong to criticise Smith for this, we'll forgive you.
 

Latest posts

Top