2018 R22 Fri - Rabbitohs 14-18 Roosters @ ANZ

[Bazal]

The count having a chuckle in the sheds.

1 point, ah ah ah
2 points, ah ah ah
3 points, ah ah ah
4 points, ah ah ah.

We won by four points! Ah ah ah.

 

[English Rose]

Still think you can’t write Souths off.

Inglis, Graham, Jennings and Johnson should all be back for the finals and Sam won’t have as bad a game as that again.

Even with all this Roosters only won by 4 points!

 

[colly]

I’m feeling nostalgic tonight. Going to watch a classic film - Fatal Attraction. One scene springs to mind.

View attachment 22246

Is that the scene where Emma Husar flashes her....
Lets have a vagina lineup!

 

[Cheap Charlie]

1 point, ah ah ah
2 points, ah ah ah
3 points, ah ah ah
4 points, ah ah ah.

We won by four points! Ah ah ah.

One. ONE obnoxious opinionated merkin.

Two. TWO obnoxious opinionated merkins. Ah! Ah! Ah!

He’ll end up counting all of us.

 

[Bazal]

One. ONE obnoxious opinionated merkin.

Two. TWO obnoxious opinionated merkins. Ah! Ah! Ah!

He’ll end up counting all of us.

Obnoxious?

I'm a f**king ray of sunshine in a dark and miserable world!

Merkin is pretty fair but

 

[Russell Coight]

Didnt watch the game but always a good night when souffs lose!

Lol@souffs

 

[Cheap Charlie]

Obnoxious?

I'm a f**king ray of sunshine in a dark and miserable world!

Merkin is pretty fair but

That’s ok. I’m obnoxious.

Team sport.

 

[JamesRustle]

One. ONE obnoxious opinionated merkin.

Two. TWO obnoxious opinionated merkins. Ah! Ah! Ah!

He’ll end up counting all of us.

That's got Rabs and Gus counted.

 

[Cheap Charlie]

It’s all down to the pink stripe. What were they thinking?

 

[Tommy Smith]

Sell that to yourself Tommy, all is ok. You just snuck home against a team with its back 5 ripped apart.

If the ruck is reffed in the finals, Storm and Roosters will struggle. But we know it wont...

And by reffed you mean Souffs not being allowed to play touch footy and being called for all the surrender tackles to get quick PTBs?

We played like trash with ball in hand. 45% possession and 70% completions. About 2 sets in attack all night.

And still won.

Lol@Souffs.

 

[Pedge1971]

And by reffed you mean Souffs not being allowed to play touch footy and being called for all the surrender tackles to get quick PTBs?

We played like trash with ball in hand. 45% possession and 70% completions. About 2 sets in attack all night.

And still won.

Lol@Souffs.

No. I mean you held them down all night and were allowed to. You say you played like shit but you can only play how the opponent and ref allows you to.

No fan of Souffs. Congrats on the win.

But I saw what I saw and if I was Seibold I would not be worried at all about tonight.....

 

[Zadar]

Still think you can’t write Souths off.

Inglis, Graham, Jennings and Johnson should all be back for the finals and Sam won’t have as bad a game as that again.

Even with all this Roosters only won by 4 points!

Keary being out almost evens out all those players out, no keary means we play without latrell and toops too.

 

[Cheap Charlie]

And by reffed you mean Souffs not being allowed to play touch footy and being called for all the surrender tackles to get quick PTBs?

We played like trash with ball in hand. 45% possession and 70% completions. About 2 sets in attack all night.

And still won.

Lol@Souffs.

1. Footy discussion.

Maybe, but I can’t recall Souths being ‘called’ for a surrender tackle. But I am on the suds.

Anyway, the crooks did what they had to do, and deserved the win.

2. Lol@Souffs?

Oh dear. Do try to not be a Twatt.

 

[Tommy Smith]

No. I mean you held them down all night and were allowed to. You say you played like shit but you can only play how the opponent and ref allows you to.

No fan of Souffs. Congrats on the win.

But I saw what I saw and if I was Seibold I would not be worried at all about tonight.....

Tbh if my team had 55% of the ball and a mountain more possession in the attacking 20 and still lost against a rival? I'd be very worried.

 

[Vic Mackey]

Fixed

Inglis, Graham, Jennings and Johnson should all be back for the finals and Sam won’t have 4 knock ons not ruled a strip again.

 

[Tommy Smith]

1. Footy discussion.

Maybe, but I can’t recall Souths being ‘called’ for a surrender tackle. But I am on the suds.

Anyway, the crooks did what they had to do, and deserved the win.

2. Lol@Souffs?

Oh dear. Do try to not be a Twatt.

Lol@Souffs is an institution on here. It's part of the furniture.

You'll learn in time.

 

[kbw]

No. I mean you held them down all night and were allowed to. You say you played like shit but you can only play how the opponent and ref allows you to.

No fan of Souffs. Congrats on the win.

But I saw what I saw and if I was Seibold I would not be worried at all about tonight.....

as opposed to slowing it down by having hands all over the ball like Souffs do. The ruck went very much both ways.
Neither team were stellar but the roosters are on the up and souffs are on the down.

I can see how Souffs fans might be upset, they are used to getting a penalty every time a burgii drops the ball, thankfully that doesn't happen too much any more. well the dropping the ball does

 

[lockyno1]

Burgess was MOTM for the Roosters

Hands like feet

 

[sensesmaybenumbed]

Obnoxious?

I'm a f**king ray of sunshine in a dark and miserable world!

Merkin is pretty fair but

Ugly merkin.

 

[Pedge1971]

as opposed to slowing it down by having hands all over the ball like Souffs do. The ruck went very much both ways.
Neither team were stellar but the roosters are on the up and souffs are on the down.

I can see how Souffs fans might be upset, they are used to getting a penalty every time a burgii drops the ball, thankfully that doesn't happen too much any more. well the dropping the ball does

Not a Souffs fan, but we agree to disagree. I would walk away from that pretty positive if I was Seibold. Robbo has seen this b4 and it never ends well....