What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2019 coach

Messages
21,880
Gus says in the podcast that the meeting between Dave O’Neill & Cleary was over the sale of Clearys house.

I can smell pork..

He also starts the podcast by saying “one day the truth will come out”

Umm, why not just tell us the truth now?!
 

Tronald Crump

Juniors
Messages
1,083
Dj_EWXNVsAEdedZ.jpg
Dj_EWXNVsAEdedZ.jpg
You have to laugh

upload_2018-8-8_14-50-49.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-8-8_14-50-26.jpeg
    upload_2018-8-8_14-50-26.jpeg
    27.6 KB · Views: 1

chrisD

Coach
Messages
14,759
Are you expecting Ivan Cleary to be coaching at the Panthers next year?

Gus - "No" - But I'm not privy to what went down in the conversation (the Cleary and Dave O'Neill conversation).

Gould says he hasn't spoken to Ivan.
 

franklin2323

Immortal
Messages
33,546
I know the story. Gus snd Ivan werent sold on him until after his debut. No doubt due to his poor work ethic off the field.

After a single game though he was Ivans fullback. He did not choose Whare or Naiqama over him.

The second tier salary cap was also stopped him getting a run earlier. He wasnt in the top 25.

Moylan was here before Ivan was. Ivan could of put him in the top 25 but didn't... So even backup guys rated now. May not be under the new coach
 
Messages
21,880
If what Gould says is correct, Dave O’Neill the panthers chairman has to go.

He’s basically gone behind the panthers board back & created all this mid season drama. Griffin was going to go at the end of the season, but O’Neill brought things on without telling anyone.
 

Pomoz

Bench
Messages
2,989
I dont necessarily disagree (that much) with anything you have said but it is besides the point? In all of the instance you list here, there is still consideration for both parties, one wants to break the contract and the other receives his (potentially negotiated) payment. In the case of say Cleary walking out the door (or SBW out the Bulldogs door), what consideration do the Tigers (or Bulldogs in SBW case) get? There isnt any.

Keep in mind that I haven't brought this up as an opinion of the rights and wrongs in this particular Cleary case, I merely brought it up because I have seen many people say "well its just the same as when a club sacks a coach or player". Its not. its totally different.

And by the way, on a totally different angle, inducement to break a legal binding contract is illegal under tort law.
If you are just referring to Ivan's case (I was also thinking of Griffins situation) then sure, consideration is an issue. I'm really referring to what happens in practice, not the strict legal interpretation as most of the time it doesn't get to that in these scenarios. Cleary would have a notice period in his contract as would the club. Agreement to shorten it is a commercial negotiation. CEO's and players leave high paying jobs for something better all the time, it really just comes down to money in the end.

I take your point about inducing Cleary to break his contract, but the Panthers don't need to induce Cleary, they just need to make an offer and its up to Cleary to decide whether he wants to end his contract and negotiate his way out of it. I would hope the Panthers aren't daft enough to make an offer in a way that is an inducement (we'll look after you, leave now, we'll get you lawyers, that sort of thing).
 

BxTom

Bench
Messages
2,674
I actually believe Gus on this Cleary thing.

I honestly believe Gus does not want Cleary as the coach next year
I don't know whether Gus wants Cleary or not, but Gus has just said that the Board wanted Griffin gone and he (Gus) wanted to give him more time. Fletcher, in the on air interview, said the board sacked Griffin on Gus's advice. So who's telling porkies?

Tom.
 

Latest posts

Top