2019 FW3 Fri - Raiders 16-10 Rabbitohs @ GIO

[ironhorse]

our gameplan at the moment is to strip Souths to death

Yeah forgot about that, seems to be the Big Plan they must have worked on all week.

 

[Pete Cash]

Yeah that should have been a try on the following play

And the ball being passed to wighton sucking in the big ones just lol

 

[t-ba]

What did AI do

Not win a ring that is for sure

 

[Mr Spock!]

Interesting second half coming up.

Big Raiders forwards looked gassed.

 

[Valheru]

Souths actually look way better at the moment

 

[AlwaysGreen]

JT wearing his wife's coat.

 

[The unknown]

Scabs should be up by like 2 tries tbh. Raiders are looking shaky

 

[mongoose]

Our defence has been great for the most part but our attack is predictable and slow.

 

[Pete Cash]

I find it amazing how fans simply dont know the rules. Is it because they are changed so often ? The rules clearly say the ball must be intentionally grounded in goal by a defender to force a line drop out. Thanks whoever posted it and saved me looking it up

 

[Rhino_NQ]

Until burgess got pinged it looked like it needed a steel pipe to the chops for the raiders to get a ruck penalty.

Spose there is an origin feel to this one so gagai decided to exist.

That set that followed the wighton run was too rubbish to be dragon like. Whoevet wins the gf gets a result off that with a dropout as a minimum

 

[t-ba]

Hey if Liam Knight doesn't get cited for gouging I don't see why Hodgson gets assessed for hitting Liam Knight...

 

[Quicksilver]

Haha “intentionally”. Like that is objective...

It was my intention at the time but then I changed my mind.

Therefore the ball should have been dead before I was allowed to change my mind

 

[Mr Spock!]

Yeah that should have been a try on the following play

Raiders were gassed mate.

 

[AlwaysGreen]

Is Fittler a doctor ? Since when has he been a HIA expert?

 

[WaznTheGreat]

Poms with brain damage are still better than Aussies

 

[Maximus]

Haha “intentionally”. Like that is objective...

He tried to keep running. Correct call.

You're the typical LU poster who think they are an expert and know it all, and yet can't admit when they were wrong and the ref clearly got it right.

It it's funny to see people whinge about there being a subjective rule when they then whinge that the obstruction rule is black and white.

 

[Bazal]

Is Fittler a doctor ? Since when has he been a HIA expert?

Well he does act like he's permanently concussed

 

[Xcalibre]

He literally got straight up and tried to continue out of the in-goal.

I wasn’t talking about the one tonight, just the rule in general. It’s a bit difficult to judge intentionality.

Anyway, I said the try was probably fair, as it was very obvious he wanted to play on.

 

[Rhino_NQ]

That missed penalty could be massive

 

[Brutus]

Roosters must be laughing.