2019 FW3 Fri - Raiders 16-10 Rabbitohs @ GIO

[Babyface O'reilly]

I find it amazing how fans simply dont know the rules. Is it because they are changed so often ? The rules clearly say the ball must be intentionally grounded in goal by a defender to force a line drop out. Thanks whoever posted it and saved me looking it up

Do we ever go a year without a rule change?

 

[Pete Cash]

Papa is good. Papa, Hodgson and tapine not to be shot into the sun

 

[Pete Cash]

Do we ever go a year without a rule change?

It is an issue with the game but im sure this rule is a few years old

 

[Xcalibre]

I think its pretty straight forward to call tbh

What about if a defender INTENDED to try and get out of the in goal, but slips or something and goes straight to ground. Gets up and keeps running but a dropout is ruled. It could feasibly be perceived as intentional grounding.

This happens often. It’s just that a try to the opposition resulted in tonight’s instance, hence the conjecture. Usually it just costs the defenders a dropout.

 

[Cockadoodledoo]

Souths need to get back the five.

 

[AlwaysGreen]

BJ fluent in seal.

 

[HowHigh]

lol Bj tellin him to get off

 

[Haffa]

BJ is such a cock should never play in a GF.

 

[2 weeks]

BJ going okay so far but a situation like this feels like it's just around the corner

 

[AlwaysGreen]

Simple Jack??????

 

[johns_reds]

Wow what a try if given!

 

[Bazal]

Simple. f**king. Jack.

I can't even...wow

 

[coolumsharkie]

K.O. 3:00 p.m.

https://www.nswrl.com.au/draw/?competition=164

Me too bro!!!

 

[Pete Cash]

BJ is such a c**k should never play in a GF.

He has haasnt he

 

[King hit]

Cotric did so well just to stay in

 

[Cockadoodledoo]

BJ is such a c**k should never play in a GF.

He already has.

 

[t-ba]

Ni Shi BenDan Jack!!!

 

[Chief_Chujo]

That's f**king amazing Jack

 

[King hit]

He has haasnt he

Yes 2010 Roosters. He scored in it as well I think.

 

[Babyface O'reilly]

It is an issue with the game but im sure this rule is a few years old

I didn’t have an issue with the rule but agree with you re confusion