skeepe
Immortal
- Messages
- 48,315
Can we get a "Premiership to Ben Cummins of the Roosters" skeepe?
Mate I’ve heard Ben is privately fuming that he didn’t win the CCM. Singlehandedly won the match.
Can we get a "Premiership to Ben Cummins of the Roosters" skeepe?
It’s not about who the ball came off, it’s about changing a call while the ball is still in play and expecting the team to react to it.I have no problem with Cronk being sin binned. It may have been "touch and go" but on that score they've been consistent. Penalty try? Was enough doubt to say no in my opinion (and I was at the ground and had a very clear view of it) as there were still tacklers Papalli would have had to beat.
The trainer call in the first half? It was the correct ruling.
As to the 6 again call, I could not see it clearly at the ground and I just missed the replay of it on Fox Sports. That said Greg Alexander said in the Fox Sports call he thought the ball came off a raiders shoulder and not Tedesco.
Where the game was won/lost? Canberra's inability to score any points beyond the penalty goal when Cronk was in the sin bin. I thought their attack in the last 25-30 minutes became predictable andd they didn't create much.
The refs can and do change their minds every week.
You keep telling yourself that was the decision that cost the raiders. Fact is they couldn't score despite all the possession against 12 men in thec2nd half.
That wasn't the refs fault, that was inept attack.
I have no problem with Cronk being sin binned. It may have been "touch and go" but on that score they've been consistent. Penalty try? Was enough doubt to say no in my opinion (and I was at the ground and had a very clear view of it) as there were still tacklers Papalli would have had to beat.
The trainer call in the first half? It was the correct ruling.
As to the 6 again call, I could not see it clearly at the ground and I just missed the replay of it on Fox Sports. That said Greg Alexander said in the Fox Sports call he thought the ball came off a raiders shoulder and not Tedesco.
Where the game was won/lost? Canberra's inability to score any points beyond the penalty goal when Cronk was in the sin bin. I thought their attack in the last 25-30 minutes became predictable andd they didn't create much.
Give it within a fortnight, and he will be lolling it up at Souths. Another f**king idiot to take the piss out of until SOO .Latrell having another of his "I'm not that interested" days.
Roosters fans should be f**king embarrassed to win like that.
There’s no glory in what happened tonight.
The two he won he couldn’t have had more geniused final opponents though haha
Please provide proof of them changing their minds mid-play every week. It has never happened before.
Changing between plays is completely different and allowed by the rules.
Keep flogging that dead horse mate.
You’re wrong.
2019 - Forever tainted.
Roosters fans should be f**king embarrassed to win like that.
There’s no glory in what happened tonight.
So do I!Bloke still had to go through Sampras. I still love ya Pat.
You'll be waiting a while.I just want a roosters fan to say yep that was shit and we were lucky.
Id be embarrassed to make a post like this.
Even Ricky accepted the outcome.
Your team can’t score tries. The Roosters can. That’s what cost you.
Latrell doesnt like games that arent strolls in the park. Never has.Give it within a fortnight, and he will be lolling it up at Souths. Another f**king idiot to take the piss out of until SOO .
Roosters fans, yes refs change call from loose carries to strips etc. but the ball is not in play when those calls are made.
This call is while the ball is in play, it’s completely different.
Stop saying that refs change their decisions all the time and then give an example of an entirely different situation.
Keep flogging that dead horse mate.
You’re wrong.
2019 - Forever tainted.
Latrell doesnt like games that arent strolls in the park. Never has.