Alan Johnson
Juniors
- Messages
- 1,869
Tainted game but the Roosters have been on another level for two seasons and were always odds on to go back-to-back. Who else is leaving apart from Cronk?
Of the 60% possession, 65% territory, and 20 odd plays inside our 20 that you had in the 2nd half last night, why is the 1 with a dodgy referee signal the sole one that stopped you from winning?
Why was the dodgy signal that denied you a single play more critical in deciding the outcome than, say, the missed knock on call against Whitehead diving on a loose ball on halfway in the 55th minute? That denied us a set of 6 in attacking position. If we are going to play the hypothetical game, if that knock on is called and we get a scrum, maybe we score while cronk is in the sin bin.
Let me guess though, that call is different for some reason.
Fact is Raiders had more than enough possession, territory, and opportunity to win the game. IF they were good enough. They were not.
So section 16.9 doesn’t actually prevent refs from correcting bad decisions then.
glad you are coming around
What the f**k are you talking about? Are you completely deranged?
There is literally a rule that says changing a decision on the run is not allowed. It doesn't matter if they would have scored or not, they weren't given the chance
What about the other chances they had in the 2nd half? Do we just ignore them?
I don't remember too many people being upset by that touch judge call in week 1.
I don’t remember too many Raiders fans trying to argue that the touch judge’s call was correct either.
Meanwhile we’ve got Tweedle-dumb and Tweedle-dumber here trying to tell us Cummins did the right thing by changing mid-play, something that literally never happens and, according to the rules of the game, cannot happen.
The call was ultimately correct though.
You are advocating for an incorrect call to stand.
Justice was served.
The Raiders were denied an opportunity to put on a play due to referee interference.
If Cummins never waves for six again, Wighton does something different.
There is nothing just about that.
I guess raiders luck ran out with that touch judge call in week 1.
Bizarre how they didn't complain about an incorrect call but are sooking about one that was ultimately correct.
The result would not have changed.
Raiders attack was simply not good enough.
The meltdown continues.
You won mate. Continuing to put shit on Raiders fans is poor form.
Maybe. Maybe not. But surely we deserved the chance to f**k it up ourselves.
Cummins took that from us. Only a fool would try to argue otherwise. But hey, if the shoe fits....
Maybe. Maybe not. But surely we deserved the chance to f**k it up ourselves.
Cummins took that from us. Only a fool would try to argue otherwise. But hey, if the shoe fits....
As an aside, have there ever been worse winners* than these Rooster fans? Danish and Valheru are having an epic meltdown despite their team winning* the grand final and becoming back-to-back* premiers* - just because people aren’t giving the Roosters enough praise for their liking.
I have never seen such sore winners* my entire life. You’d think you’d be happy with the win*, but that’s not enough for these f**kwits.
As an aside, have there ever been worse winners* than these Rooster fans? Danish and Valheru are having an epic meltdown despite their team winning* the grand final and becoming back-to-back* premiers* - just because people aren’t giving the Roosters enough praise for their liking.
I have never seen such sore winners* my entire life. You’d think you’d be happy with the win*, but that’s not enough for these f**kwits.