I hate the argument or the notion that the Raiders did themselves no favours by not scoring in the 2nd half with all that possession and an extra man for 10 minutes while Cronk was in the bin. There's nothing in any rugby league rulebook or gameplan that says "if you dominate possession and field territory for x-minutes and don't score, then you have no right to complain if you lose the game". I've heard the likes of Sterlo say that the Raiders lost the game by not scoring in that period in the 2nd half. Bollocks - the Raiders didn't LOSE the game in that period, the Roosters did everything they were asked to WIN the game at that time.
FFS, the last time my team won a GF, the score was 4-2 and there wasn't a try scored in the match. Both teams "had opportunities" to score but didn't so which won deserved to lose despite having their chances??
The in play change of ruling from 6 again to last tackle was embarrassing on the code's biggest stage. Absolutely embarrassing and heads should roll, nothing surer. People arguing that ref's change decisions all the time are delusional. There is a clear difference between what happened last night and a ref getting a call from the Bunker to change say a 20 metre tap instead of a drop out. What happened last night was akin to a player knocking on, ref calling it, everyone stopping and then ref saying 2 seconds later , "No sorry, play on, came off his knee"... and player running away to score up the other end. Again, embarrassing that it came down to such an incompetent decision. No conviction from the people in charge, simple as that and that includes the politician in waiting Mr Greenberg. All lip service and no substance.
In saying all of that, if the 6 again call stood and Sezer kicks a field goal and they win by 1, that's not a great result either given it shouldn't have been 6 again. But people are more prepared to live with a bad call than a couple of yellow bellied refs who ruined the games biggest day. Time for the 2 ref nonsense to be ended now.