imgunawin72
Juniors
- Messages
- 569
Bring on the footy next week its been a long off season !!!!
Generally that's how the draw is - GBW/Uni, Moorebank/Blacktown, Wests/EastCtn, Mounties/REH from memory, with Belrose playing whoever has the RMC bye.Align every Shield team with a Ron Massey team and the one extra Shield team with the BYE. When the massey team has the bye their shield team plays. Problem solved.
Generally that's how the draw is - GBW/Uni, Moorebank/Blacktown, Wests/EastCtn, Mounties/REH from memory, with Belrose playing whoever has the RMC bye.
What further would complicate it is venue availability, so on and so forth.
Again, a far bigger deal than most are making out.
I see your point, but maybe the bye rounds are more about giving the players a rest weekend/s during the season.I reckon the reason they schedule all these byes is so they give 8 points to every team without winning any games. As only 4 teams don't make the finals, instead of having a "finalist" with only 12 points in the season, they record 20 points and it looks like they had a decent season instead of the woeful reality.
I see your point, but maybe the bye rounds are more about giving the players a rest weekend/s during the season.
I was referring to the bye rounds in SS.A few years ago, there were 7 byes in RMC, and the clubs showed how much the players needed a rest by putting a stack of them in SS in those weeks. Wests managed to get 1 game in 4 weeks twice during 2017.
Quoting individual instances doesn't make your point correct.Venue availability??? Rubbish. In round 3 Wenty play St.Marys in Ron Massey yet both teams have the BYE in shield and therefore do not play each other twice - I am pretty sure the venue that the Massey game is being played at would also accommodate the Shield game. In Round 10 Asquith play Hills in Ron Massey while their Shield teams both have a BYE and thus only play each other once in Shield. It happens regularly. Its actually more complicated making two teams have a BYE so they dont play each other twice then it would be to just make a fair home and away draw.
It doesnt make my point incorrect either.Quoting individual instances doesn't make your point correct.
I'm not suggesting the draw is perfect but it's not *that* bad. As I outlined initially most of it is to do with the fact the season starts earlier as well - three weeks earlier in fact.
They may have agreed to a certain number of games before the number of teams was confirmed and built a rod for their own backs.It doesnt make my point incorrect either.
Again, starting the comp 3 weeks earlier should only give them more opportunity to play everyone twice. The comp has 24 rounds. We can agree to disagree but there is really no valid reason it cant be just a normal, fair, home and away season.
Yep maybe but if they go to top 5 for example then the finals series would be shorter, which means either a shorter season or more round games. I’d rather watch an extra week or 2 of finals.On the finals, they should really consider moving both the RMC and Shield to a top 5. Having 8 teams out of 11/12 qualify for the playoffs is a joke.
Huh?Yep maybe but if they go to top 5 for example then the finals series would be shorter, which means either a shorter season or more round games. I’d rather watch an extra week or 2 of finals.
Fair commentsYes, 5 team finals has nothing to do with less weeks played but everything to do with quality. Last year in SS Guildford had 7 wins 2 draws and 9 losses but played in the GF. Having a top 5 means that you are restricting the finals to teams that have had a relatively good season so again in SS last year the 4th team had 13 wins 5 losses and the 5th team 11 wins and 7 losses so 4 teams went well and one scraped in by a point on a middling performance.
Instead we had 2 teams that had both won 5 out 17 playing each other in the last round to see who had the honour of being a 40-50 point inferior side in the "finals". Limit the finals to well performed teams and then a fluke result means the winners will still be worthy.