Last night the NSW womans winger had the same grounding and it was disallowed.
For mine a try is correct in that case. But how can the bunker last night say no try... and tonight overturn onfield refs to award one for damn near identical grounding?
What the f**k happened to the Mad Butcher?
He’d be mad not to.Great game from the Kiwis.
I’m betting Madge will be having a word to Brandon Smith and promising him the world at the Tigers.
Cancer.
That’s because there are different rules for grounding a rolling ball and dropping and regathering before grounding.It’s a toss of the coin with those things. Sometimes they want downward pressure, other times they talk separation or control.
What the f**k happened to the Mad Butcher?
That’s because there are different rules for grounding a rolling ball and dropping and regathering before grounding.
I honestly miss the downward pressure rulings. They were more consistent.It’s a toss of the coin with those things. Sometimes they want downward pressure, other times they talk separation or control.
If there is separation when you are in possession you have to regain control.Which is?
I thought last night's one was a try.I honestly miss the downward pressure rulings. They were more consistent.
The whole separation and control thing can't even be consistent from one night to the next. Uet the whole point of the bunker was supposed to be for consistency to improve.
If there is separation when you are in possession you have to regain control.
If it’s a rolling ball you just need to put downward pressure. You don’t need control.
He didn’t need to. It was a rolling ball.I don’t think he really regained control on that one though.