Might be reasonable but it gets boring pretty quick if we all just nod along with the coach. I'm happy enough with Crichton on wing & Momo in the centres...just the 14 is contentious for me.I always defer to the line the coach knows best, which for the most part is not unreasonable. Having said that our coaches decision at the back end of last season backfired big time, his late season dropping of Naden and bringing May into the centre’s was highly questionable. It cost us in the end. I’m happy to back his judgement in respect of Crichton on the wing, Momo in the centre’s and May as 14. It is what it is.
He wasn't the only one in that category by any means. Players of much higher status in the team who were playing in their usual positions conceded cheap possession leading to points against us.bringing May into the centre’s was highly questionable. It cost us in the end.
Hoping we run our best team & get some rhythm considering how disrupted our 2nd half of the season has been.I think Leniu might get a run at the expense of either Martin or Sorensen.
I’ve endured the bad times. Stuck solid over fifty years. I’m loving recent times, the Gould rebirth, the successful Hook three seasons, a blip in Ivan’s first season back and go figure we are where we are now. I just posted, albeit rather lengthy on the General Discussion thread a post that sums up my views. We are so fortunate, by all means have differing views around team selections but given our history we are now considered a powerhouse. Who would have ever dreamed that possible particularly those of us who have been around for the long haul.Might be reasonable but it gets boring pretty quick if we all just nod along with the coach. I'm happy enough with Crichton on wing & Momo in the centres...just the 14 is contentious for me.
So now we're going to start comparing the length of our .... fandomI’ve endured the bad times. Stuck solid over fifty years. I’m loving recent times, the Gould rebirth, the successful Hook three seasons, a blip in Ivan’s first season back and go figure we are where we are now. I just posted, albeit rather lengthy on the General Discussion thread a post that sums up my views. We are so fortunate, by all means have differing views around team selections but given our history we are now considered a powerhouse. Who would have ever dreamed that possible particularly those of us who have been around for the long haul.
The Naden one is a bit strange, fought his way back into the starting side, did pretty well and now nowhere to be seen.
Not the point I was trying to make. No I’m definitely not Rob Weaver.So now we're going to start comparing the length of our .... fandom
Granted I'm not as old as you but been a Panther fan since the early 80s - nearly 40 years so seen my fair share of lean trots. Not sure that anyone feels a "sense of entitlement" but that might just be your coping mechanism to any opinion that doesn't align with "the club knows best".
Mate, these are very good times and none of us want to see them not rewarded in the form of premierships. And if you don't want to engage in discussion on team selections because it ultimately upsets you, then don't engage. No one will think less of you.
As a side note, are you Rob Weaver as you seem to have similar philosophies re appropriate forum viewpoints?
Melbourne play before us .So we will know if we need to win.Taking players off halftime will be a easy decisdionWe only got our side back together last week so we need this game at full strength. I would be pulling our 3 most important players (Cleary, Yeo, Api) at halftime though
I don’t know mate. I wish the Eels had selected there best side. It doesn't do us any favours playing a vastly undermanned side. Maybe protect Nathan given his situation but otherwise I say put the foot down and carve them up Regardless of what happens in the early game.Melbourne play before us .So we will know if we need to win.Taking players off halftime will be a easy decisdion
Pretty solid summation right there.I'm ok with a full strength team, quibbles about May/Kenny aside.
Yes you can suffer injuries, but this specific 17 has had one full game since round 12. The cobwebs were obvious on Sunday, even against weak opposition. More game time has it's benefits, as does maintaining a winning culture across the squad, especially against a team we might face up against in a bigger game. Injuries are a risk, but so is the ongoing instability across the squad. I don't think we should perpetuate it if we don't have to at this time of the year.
I don’t know mate. I wish the Eels had selected there best side. It doesn't do us any favours playing a vastly undermanned side. Maybe protect Nathan given his situation but otherwise I say put the foot down and carve them up Regardless of what happens in the early game.
I don’t get it. Your team selection is resigning yourselves to a spot outside the top four when a spot is up for grabs. The Cowboys could just beat Manly. Very poor on your coaches part in my opinion.Oh and Mahoneys out for the year. So only 4 guys whod normally make the side. And one of those is W.Smith.
Melbourne play before us .So we will know if we need to win.Taking players off halftime will be a easy decisdion
I don’t get it. Your team selection is resigning yourselves to a spot outside the top four when a spot is up for grabs. The Cowboys could just beat Manly. Very poor on your coaches part in my opinion.