What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2023-2028 next tv deal discussion

The Penguin #6.

Juniors
Messages
1,161
Some say that Shakespeare could have added " come " as in " the truth will come out " however as is typical of that genius for economy he left it out. Scholars do argue though that it was a Shakespeare original as he did feel the need to make a brief explanation of what he meant.
Back to the League.
 

Colk

First Grade
Messages
6,750
Some say that Shakespeare could have added " come " as in " the truth will come out " however as is typical of that genius for economy he left it out. Scholars do argue though that it was a Shakespeare original as he did feel the need to make a brief explanation of what he meant.
Back to the League.

I remember the text just wanted to see how you wanted to end it
 

tri_colours

Juniors
Messages
1,923
Not sure if you have read this.

The Age




ExclusiveSportNRLNRL 2022

NRL to seek millions in compensation from Foxtel after monster AFL deal
Michael Chammas
By Michael Chammas
September 12, 2022 — 6.00am

The NRL will seek tens of millions of dollars in compensation from broadcast partner Foxtel after the pay-TV giant struck a mammoth rights deal with the AFL last week.

Some clubs are under the impression the NRL has an ace up its sleeve that will allow them to return to the negotiation table with Foxtel for the seven-year deal it signed in 2020.

As reported by the Herald at the time of the renegotiated television deal, at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, ARLC chairman Peter V’landys and NRL chief executive Andrew Abdo tried to include a “most-favoured” clause in its five-year extension with Foxtel.

It would have prohibited the pay television provider from striking a better deal with the AFL without compensating the NRL for the difference.

Foxtel rejected the NRL’s request, but the club's are under the impression that the governing body believes there was an understanding between the two parties to revisit the deal if the AFL’s deal gazumped that of rugby league. Foxtel did not respond to requests for comment. The NRL declined to comment.

The deals are difficult to compare. The AFL has an extra game each round. The AFL has also secured exclusive rights to all Saturday games in the first eight rounds, but in exchange will hand the Seven Network exclusive Thursday nights for the first 15 rounds from 2025.
The AFL’s new deal, which commences in 2025, is worth about $640 million annually.

Whether Foxtel believes it is under any obligation to compensate the NRL is unclear. The pay television network paid around $200 million a season for the NRL when it renegotiated its rights deal two years ago.

Combined with the free-to-air deal with Nine Entertainment Co, the publishers of this masthead, New Zealand, international and radio rights, the total deal is approximately $400m per year.
Advertisement

The AFL’s deal with Foxtel and Seven is reportedly worth around $640m a year from 2025-2031. The Foxtel component of the deal is believed to make up about 60 per cent of that figure, or just under $400m.

Over the past week, V’landys and Abdo have been heavily criticised for leaving money on the table when they sat down with Foxtel, leaving some clubs seeing red.
Foxtel pays the NRL about $200 million a year under the agreement renegotiated at the height of the COVID-19 uncertainty.

V’landys has assured them there is nothing to fear but won’t divulge the ace up his sleeve. V'landys declined to comment, describing discussions as "confidential".

The Herald has been told that ace is a perceived verbal agreement between the NRL and Foxtel chief executive Patrick Delany that the NRL’s willingness to do a deal at the height of COVID-19 uncertainty wouldn’t be forgotten.

V’landys indicated as much when he highlighted the dire predicament Foxtel found itself in when all of Australia’s sporting codes were forced to shut down two years ago, leaving Fox Sports without content to provide its paying subscribers.

“At the time, Fox needed an asset on its sheet to continue its viability. If we didn’t come into play, there’d be no Foxtel,” V’landys told the Herald last week.

Rubbery figures, but AFL has 100 million reasons to gloat over TV deal

“If Foxtel coughs, all the codes catch a cold. If you haven’t got them in play, the other parties won’t be paying as much as they should because you need competitive tension. When COVID-19 hit, they were the only ones. If they went under, there was no one else available.”

V’landys also recently went to war with the NSW government over a perceived verbal agreement to invest almost $800m into Sydney suburban grounds. But the government later decided to prioritise funding to the towns ripped apart by recent floods, much to the dismay of the ARLC chair.

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/nrl/nrl ... 5bh6w.html
 

Colk

First Grade
Messages
6,750
Not sure if you have read this.

The Age




ExclusiveSportNRLNRL 2022

NRL to seek millions in compensation from Foxtel after monster AFL deal
Michael Chammas
By Michael Chammas
September 12, 2022 — 6.00am

The NRL will seek tens of millions of dollars in compensation from broadcast partner Foxtel after the pay-TV giant struck a mammoth rights deal with the AFL last week.

Some clubs are under the impression the NRL has an ace up its sleeve that will allow them to return to the negotiation table with Foxtel for the seven-year deal it signed in 2020.

As reported by the Herald at the time of the renegotiated television deal, at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, ARLC chairman Peter V’landys and NRL chief executive Andrew Abdo tried to include a “most-favoured” clause in its five-year extension with Foxtel.

It would have prohibited the pay television provider from striking a better deal with the AFL without compensating the NRL for the difference.

Foxtel rejected the NRL’s request, but the club's are under the impression that the governing body believes there was an understanding between the two parties to revisit the deal if the AFL’s deal gazumped that of rugby league. Foxtel did not respond to requests for comment. The NRL declined to comment.

The deals are difficult to compare. The AFL has an extra game each round. The AFL has also secured exclusive rights to all Saturday games in the first eight rounds, but in exchange will hand the Seven Network exclusive Thursday nights for the first 15 rounds from 2025.
The AFL’s new deal, which commences in 2025, is worth about $640 million annually.

Whether Foxtel believes it is under any obligation to compensate the NRL is unclear. The pay television network paid around $200 million a season for the NRL when it renegotiated its rights deal two years ago.

Combined with the free-to-air deal with Nine Entertainment Co, the publishers of this masthead, New Zealand, international and radio rights, the total deal is approximately $400m per year.
Advertisement

The AFL’s deal with Foxtel and Seven is reportedly worth around $640m a year from 2025-2031. The Foxtel component of the deal is believed to make up about 60 per cent of that figure, or just under $400m.

Over the past week, V’landys and Abdo have been heavily criticised for leaving money on the table when they sat down with Foxtel, leaving some clubs seeing red.
Foxtel pays the NRL about $200 million a year under the agreement renegotiated at the height of the COVID-19 uncertainty.

V’landys has assured them there is nothing to fear but won’t divulge the ace up his sleeve. V'landys declined to comment, describing discussions as "confidential".

The Herald has been told that ace is a perceived verbal agreement between the NRL and Foxtel chief executive Patrick Delany that the NRL’s willingness to do a deal at the height of COVID-19 uncertainty wouldn’t be forgotten.

V’landys indicated as much when he highlighted the dire predicament Foxtel found itself in when all of Australia’s sporting codes were forced to shut down two years ago, leaving Fox Sports without content to provide its paying subscribers.

“At the time, Fox needed an asset on its sheet to continue its viability. If we didn’t come into play, there’d be no Foxtel,” V’landys told the Herald last week.

Rubbery figures, but AFL has 100 million reasons to gloat over TV deal

“If Foxtel coughs, all the codes catch a cold. If you haven’t got them in play, the other parties won’t be paying as much as they should because you need competitive tension. When COVID-19 hit, they were the only ones. If they went under, there was no one else available.”

V’landys also recently went to war with the NSW government over a perceived verbal agreement to invest almost $800m into Sydney suburban grounds. But the government later decided to prioritise funding to the towns ripped apart by recent floods, much to the dismay of the ARLC chair.

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/nrl/nrl ... 5bh6w.html

I have. We don’t have a leg to stand on. Seriously, if you have an agreement, draw up a contract and have it f****** signed. At this point in time, Fox will tell them bad luck.
 
Messages
3,224
Not sure if you have read this.

The Age




ExclusiveSportNRLNRL 2022

NRL to seek millions in compensation from Foxtel after monster AFL deal
Michael Chammas
By Michael Chammas
September 12, 2022 — 6.00am

The NRL will seek tens of millions of dollars in compensation from broadcast partner Foxtel after the pay-TV giant struck a mammoth rights deal with the AFL last week.

Some clubs are under the impression the NRL has an ace up its sleeve that will allow them to return to the negotiation table with Foxtel for the seven-year deal it signed in 2020.

As reported by the Herald at the time of the renegotiated television deal, at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, ARLC chairman Peter V’landys and NRL chief executive Andrew Abdo tried to include a “most-favoured” clause in its five-year extension with Foxtel.

It would have prohibited the pay television provider from striking a better deal with the AFL without compensating the NRL for the difference.

Foxtel rejected the NRL’s request, but the club's are under the impression that the governing body believes there was an understanding between the two parties to revisit the deal if the AFL’s deal gazumped that of rugby league. Foxtel did not respond to requests for comment. The NRL declined to comment.

The deals are difficult to compare. The AFL has an extra game each round. The AFL has also secured exclusive rights to all Saturday games in the first eight rounds, but in exchange will hand the Seven Network exclusive Thursday nights for the first 15 rounds from 2025.
The AFL’s new deal, which commences in 2025, is worth about $640 million annually.

Whether Foxtel believes it is under any obligation to compensate the NRL is unclear. The pay television network paid around $200 million a season for the NRL when it renegotiated its rights deal two years ago.

Combined with the free-to-air deal with Nine Entertainment Co, the publishers of this masthead, New Zealand, international and radio rights, the total deal is approximately $400m per year.
Advertisement

The AFL’s deal with Foxtel and Seven is reportedly worth around $640m a year from 2025-2031. The Foxtel component of the deal is believed to make up about 60 per cent of that figure, or just under $400m.

Over the past week, V’landys and Abdo have been heavily criticised for leaving money on the table when they sat down with Foxtel, leaving some clubs seeing red.
Foxtel pays the NRL about $200 million a year under the agreement renegotiated at the height of the COVID-19 uncertainty.

V’landys has assured them there is nothing to fear but won’t divulge the ace up his sleeve. V'landys declined to comment, describing discussions as "confidential".

The Herald has been told that ace is a perceived verbal agreement between the NRL and Foxtel chief executive Patrick Delany that the NRL’s willingness to do a deal at the height of COVID-19 uncertainty wouldn’t be forgotten.

V’landys indicated as much when he highlighted the dire predicament Foxtel found itself in when all of Australia’s sporting codes were forced to shut down two years ago, leaving Fox Sports without content to provide its paying subscribers.

“At the time, Fox needed an asset on its sheet to continue its viability. If we didn’t come into play, there’d be no Foxtel,” V’landys told the Herald last week.

Rubbery figures, but AFL has 100 million reasons to gloat over TV deal

“If Foxtel coughs, all the codes catch a cold. If you haven’t got them in play, the other parties won’t be paying as much as they should because you need competitive tension. When COVID-19 hit, they were the only ones. If they went under, there was no one else available.”

V’landys also recently went to war with the NSW government over a perceived verbal agreement to invest almost $800m into Sydney suburban grounds. But the government later decided to prioritise funding to the towns ripped apart by recent floods, much to the dismay of the ARLC chair.

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/nrl/nrl ... 5bh6w.html
Vlandys seems to be an individual who is happy to take people at their word , back fired with parrotfart
may too with Delany ...... may not

the issue as I have stated for foxtel is if they don't believe they have to honour any verbal agreement then they jeopardise the rights for 2028

Interesting Vlandys take on the landscape & foxtels role in it
no foxtel , everyone gets paid less
I don't agree with that
theres new players & they all need a flagship
Stan
Paramount
Amazon
Optus

they'll be buyers
 
Messages
530
NRL did have a memorandum of understanding to renovate Accor stadium. Whilst that was a signed agreement, it's just like an intention to enter into a legally binding agreement.

The thing with fox is if they tell NRL to get fked, they know that in 2027 they'll be on the backfoot. If they do that, they will have to get rid of Vlandys.

While I have been heavily critical of Peter Vlandys, he does need to redeem himself fast. Or should I say given the opportunity to do so.

Even if he replace him, he really are locked into a shit situation until 2027, and no guarantee we can get anyone good. I mean we need holistic change to the governance, strategy and commission. Sadly, I think our best shot lies with Vlandys. If he can somehow salvage the stadiums, tv deal and maybe announce an 18th team, he will have his legacy and can then move on..
 

The Penguin #6.

Juniors
Messages
1,161
NRL did have a memorandum of understanding to renovate Accor stadium. Whilst that was a signed agreement, it's just like an intention to enter into a legally binding agreement.

The thing with fox is if they tell NRL to get fked, they know that in 2027 they'll be on the backfoot. If they do that, they will have to get rid of Vlandys.

While I have been heavily critical of Peter Vlandys, he does need to redeem himself fast. Or should I say given the opportunity to do so.

Even if he replace him, he really are locked into a shit situation until 2027, and no guarantee we can get anyone good. I mean we need holistic change to the governance, strategy and commission. Sadly, I think our best shot lies with Vlandys. If he can somehow salvage the stadiums, tv deal and maybe announce an 18th team, he will have his legacy and can then move on..
I have been a fan of V`landy`s and I like his combative style but I likemany have been very disappointed with what has unfolded this week.
V`landy`s is an egomaniac but unquestionably loves Rugby League. I think this week`s events may be the kick-up-the-arse that the NRL need and V`landy`s will be very keen to redeem himself and his reputation which honestly is in tatters at the moment.
 

Colk

First Grade
Messages
6,750
NRL did have a memorandum of understanding to renovate Accor stadium. Whilst that was a signed agreement, it's just like an intention to enter into a legally binding agreement.

The thing with fox is if they tell NRL to get fked, they know that in 2027 they'll be on the backfoot. If they do that, they will have to get rid of Vlandys.

While I have been heavily critical of Peter Vlandys, he does need to redeem himself fast. Or should I say given the opportunity to do so.

Even if he replace him, he really are locked into a shit situation until 2027, and no guarantee we can get anyone good. I mean we need holistic change to the governance, strategy and commission. Sadly, I think our best shot lies with Vlandys. If he can somehow salvage the stadiums, tv deal and maybe announce an 18th team, he will have his legacy and can then move on..

That paragraph there is why nothing will come out of all this bluster. If News Ltd didn’t have undue influence over the code then we wouldn’t have signed such a deal in the first place

It is also why they can just replace him another stooge if V’landys pushes them too far.
 

Ramsay Snow

Juniors
Messages
234
Not sure if you have read this.

The Age




ExclusiveSportNRLNRL 2022

NRL to seek millions in compensation from Foxtel after monster AFL deal
Michael Chammas
By Michael Chammas
September 12, 2022 — 6.00am

The NRL will seek tens of millions of dollars in compensation from broadcast partner Foxtel after the pay-TV giant struck a mammoth rights deal with the AFL last week.

Some clubs are under the impression the NRL has an ace up its sleeve that will allow them to return to the negotiation table with Foxtel for the seven-year deal it signed in 2020.

As reported by the Herald at the time of the renegotiated television deal, at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, ARLC chairman Peter V’landys and NRL chief executive Andrew Abdo tried to include a “most-favoured” clause in its five-year extension with Foxtel.

It would have prohibited the pay television provider from striking a better deal with the AFL without compensating the NRL for the difference.

Foxtel rejected the NRL’s request, but the club's are under the impression that the governing body believes there was an understanding between the two parties to revisit the deal if the AFL’s deal gazumped that of rugby league. Foxtel did not respond to requests for comment. The NRL declined to comment.

The deals are difficult to compare. The AFL has an extra game each round. The AFL has also secured exclusive rights to all Saturday games in the first eight rounds, but in exchange will hand the Seven Network exclusive Thursday nights for the first 15 rounds from 2025.
The AFL’s new deal, which commences in 2025, is worth about $640 million annually.

Whether Foxtel believes it is under any obligation to compensate the NRL is unclear. The pay television network paid around $200 million a season for the NRL when it renegotiated its rights deal two years ago.

Combined with the free-to-air deal with Nine Entertainment Co, the publishers of this masthead, New Zealand, international and radio rights, the total deal is approximately $400m per year.
Advertisement

The AFL’s deal with Foxtel and Seven is reportedly worth around $640m a year from 2025-2031. The Foxtel component of the deal is believed to make up about 60 per cent of that figure, or just under $400m.

Over the past week, V’landys and Abdo have been heavily criticised for leaving money on the table when they sat down with Foxtel, leaving some clubs seeing red.
Foxtel pays the NRL about $200 million a year under the agreement renegotiated at the height of the COVID-19 uncertainty.

V’landys has assured them there is nothing to fear but won’t divulge the ace up his sleeve. V'landys declined to comment, describing discussions as "confidential".

The Herald has been told that ace is a perceived verbal agreement between the NRL and Foxtel chief executive Patrick Delany that the NRL’s willingness to do a deal at the height of COVID-19 uncertainty wouldn’t be forgotten.

V’landys indicated as much when he highlighted the dire predicament Foxtel found itself in when all of Australia’s sporting codes were forced to shut down two years ago, leaving Fox Sports without content to provide its paying subscribers.

“At the time, Fox needed an asset on its sheet to continue its viability. If we didn’t come into play, there’d be no Foxtel,” V’landys told the Herald last week.

Rubbery figures, but AFL has 100 million reasons to gloat over TV deal

“If Foxtel coughs, all the codes catch a cold. If you haven’t got them in play, the other parties won’t be paying as much as they should because you need competitive tension. When COVID-19 hit, they were the only ones. If they went under, there was no one else available.”

V’landys also recently went to war with the NSW government over a perceived verbal agreement to invest almost $800m into Sydney suburban grounds. But the government later decided to prioritise funding to the towns ripped apart by recent floods, much to the dismay of the ARLC chair.

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/nrl/nrl ... 5bh6w.html

1662977264749.jpeg
 

Ramsay Snow

Juniors
Messages
234
V’L had his time at the pig trough and he got his fill, after a few drinks he goes back and wants another go, is told to GAGF.
 

Latest posts

Top