That's a perfectly reasonable opinion.
I'm merely saying that Robbo deserves the opportunity to get us out of this hole and deserves a little more leeway than others would get. Having said that this does have to come back to him at some point and the Roosters don't accept failure so if this continues in to next season he will be on the hot seat.
He doesn’t miss much and loves chiming in when it’s the other team doesn’t he?How about if you are going to whinge and moan when things go against you, maybe you should admit when you benefit. Instead any time his team benefits, he says he didn't see the incident.
Settle chief. I was glad it wasn’t called just thought it might be at time. I posted that before I even saw a replay. As someone else pointed out even if he was it’d have been very harsh call because he winds up nowhere near the ballHe was onside, he can be wherever he wants to be. Are you taking the piss?
View attachment 74457
View attachment 74459
He was onside, he can be wherever he wants to be. Are you taking the piss?
View attachment 74457
View attachment 74459
You claimed he was offside & he clearly wasn’t. No need to settle as I’m quite calm. I am astounded your eyesight or knowledge of the rules is that poor.Settle chief. I was glad it wasn’t called just thought it might be at time. I posted that before I even saw a replay. As someone else pointed out even if he was it’d have been very harsh call because he winds up nowhere near the ball
I understand parallax effect. Although this wouldn’t have that much of an distortion on the image I used. All it was is a very basic pictorial representation of where the feet were positioned was to help 84 baby see that he wasn’t offside. Yes I highlighted his back foot as that is the one that is touching the ground (for perspective). Is his front foot in front of Hunts foot kicking the ball? No.1. You don't understand parallax, do you? You can't just draw parallel lines across a screen and think that compensates for perspective!
2. You've highlighted his back foot. You do realise it's both feet behind the kicker?
Having said that , he was probably onside, but your pictures prove nothing.
Cool thing bruvnorYou claimed he was offside & he clearly wasn’t. No need to settle as I’m quite calm. I am astounded your eyesight or knowledge of the rules is that poor.