Isn’t that why there’s an independent doctor though? Neither the independent doctor or the club’s head of medical believed that he was displaying any symptoms of concussion. I don’t know why everyone now suddenly thinks that they’re Neurologists and know more than the people employed to do the job.
The Knights took off Frizzell (who I’d argue is just as important to the Knights from a finals perspective) for a HIA during a crucial part of the match so I really don’t think they’re trying to “roll the dice” to win games. More likely they’re trusting the judgement of medical professionals.
The suggestion is that the independent doctor can still get influenced by the moment. It's the dying stages of a final, no doubt there exists pressure to make a certain decision.
I don't care if you think I'm a neurologist. I'm not. What I am, is aware of biases in humans. I watch the NRL intently every week, and I see head knocks like that undergo HIAs with regularity. Especially with regards to the free interchange rule. So why not this one, with a guy with a reasonably significant history of concussion? I think I know the answer, even if you want to say that independent doctors are completely robotic and void of influence.
The Frizzell incident isn't the same. Look at what Joey Johns said in commentary about Ponga 'can he kick?!?!' - that suggests that this one was particularly influential.
At the end of the day, this is my opinion. I wasn't there. I'm not a doctor. But I have an opinion. I'm allowed one, otherwise this forum doesn't exist. And if we are going to blindly accept whatever is done in this space, I don't know if that's a good outcome.