Rugby league is nowhere near as big as the UFC... But our crowds are bigger..why?
Because thier arenas are smaller..and it's not great viewing if you're too far away , there's too much going on in detail up close that makes it better on Television unless you can afford the good seats.
So , why are Rugby league's crowds smaller than AFL? Could it be that it's played on a smaller arena , that's not great viewing if you're too far away and there's too much going on in detail that makes it better viewing on TV unless you can afford the good seats....
Why this stupid comparison keeps coming up is beyond me..
They are 2 completely different things!!
And for anyone who questions it, do this: go to both. I have: The MCG was $20 ( don't know what it is now) you could sit wherever you want.. because there's no bad seats( it's equally good anywhere on the ground because contests happen all over the ground) if you sit up high, you get a birds eye view or you can be close to the action.
At that same time in my life I went to a League game where the cheapest seats at the Titans was $25 up in the corner I was allocated a seat where only when they were attacking my corner was I not just watching the big screen.. and to top it off you get about 25 minutes less entertainment.
This comparison needs to stop.